ArticleEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2010
Is there any difference between acetylator phenotypes in tuberculosis patients and healthy subjects?
Article in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Expression of NAT2 in immune system cells and the relation of NAT2 gene polymorphisms in the anti-tuberculosis therapy in Mexican mestizo population.Molecular biology reports · 2014Article
- Determination of Arylamine N-Acetyltransferase 2 Acetylation Genotype by PCR and Phenotyping Using Dapsone Through High-Pressure Liquid Chromatography Assay: A Gender Wise Study.Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis SocietyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeMany studies have been done to determine the distribution of acetylator phenotypes among populations of different geographic origin. The goal of this study was to investigate the acetylator phenotypes of the Iranian population and compare them between tubercular patients and healthy subjects.
methodsThe study population consisted of two groups; the first group included 100 newly diagnosed tubercular patients and the second group consisted of 100 healthy subjects. Acetylator phenotype was determined from the metabolic ratio of acetyl-isoniazid to isoniazid in the plasma samples. Metabolic ratio was used to classify subjects as slow (= or < 0.70) or fast acetylators (>0.70).
resultsIn the tubercular patients, the frequencies of slow and fast acetylator phenotypes were 62 and 38%, respectively. Of the healthy individuals, 45% were found to be slow acetylators and the remaining 55% were fast acetylators.
conclusionIt seems that tubercular patients metabolize isoniazid more slowly than healthy individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.