Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20186574›Full record

Trial reportJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2010

Mediators of fruit and vegetable consumption among colorectal cancer survivors.

Linda K Ko, Marci K Campbell, Megan A Lewis, Joanne Earp, Brenda Devellis

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Dietary interventions for adult cancer survivors.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Lifestyle issues for colorectal cancer survivors--perceived needs, beliefs and opportunities.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Linda K KoUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA. lindako@email.unc.edu
Marci K Campbell
Megan A Lewis
Joanne Earp
Brenda Devellis
UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer CenterUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USRTI International · US

Funding

LINEBERGER CANCER CONTROL EDUCATION PROGRAMR25CA057726 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI EARP, JO ANNE L, RIBISL, KURT M. · 1992 to 2016
$8.0M
HEALTH COMMUNICATION IN CANCER CONTROLR01CA081914 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI CAMPBELL, MARCI K · 1999 to 2004
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA081914NCI NIH HHS R01-CA81914NCI NIH HHS R25 CA057726
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDue to early detection and treatment, survival from colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnosis has been steadily increasing. A CRC diagnosis could be considered a "teachable moment," a time when interventionists might successfully promote dietary changes. CRC interventions with tailored print communication (TPC) and telephone motivational interviewing (TMI) have been shown to be effective in promoting fruit and vegetable consumption (FVC) among CRC survivors. However, little is known about how these interventions work to exert their effect. This study investigated whether information processes mediate the relationship between a CRC intervention and FVC among CRC survivors.

methodsThis research used data from NC STRIDES, a study that tested the efficacy of two CRC intervention strategies to promote FVC among CRC survivors. Participants were randomized to control, TPC, TMI, or combined (TPC+TMI). Structural equation models were constructed to analyze data from 266 CRC survivors using two different measures of FVC, a 35-item and a 2-item measure.

resultsTwo information processes, relevance of communication and trust in the communication, mediated the effect of TPC+TMI on FVC for both 35-item and 2-item measures. TPC+TMI was significantly associated with relevance of communication, and perceiving greater relevance was significantly related to trust in the communication. Trust was significantly related to FVC. DISCUSSION: Information processes, including relevance and trust in the communication, serve as mediators of the relationship between the CRC intervention and FVC. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Future intervention research should investigate ways to enhance relevance of communication and trust in interventions with CRC survivors.

Indexed as

DietFruitVegetablesAdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCase-Control StudiesColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleHealth EducationHealth PromotionHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotivation

Identifiers

PMID20186574
PMCPMC4863647
OpenAlexW2086604599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.