ArticleMolecular diversity2010
Prediction of carcinogenicity for diverse chemicals based on substructure grouping and SVM modeling.
Article in Molecular diversity, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning-Based Approaches for Genetic Damage Prediction.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Unlocking the potential of AI: Machine learning and deep learning models for predicting carcinogenicity of chemicals.Journal of environmental science and health. Part C, Toxicology and carcinogenesis · 2025Review
- QSAR Classification Modeling Using Machine Learning with a Consensus-Based Approach for Multivariate Chemical Hazard End Points.ACS omega · 2024Article
- DCAMCP: A deep learning model based on capsule network and attention mechanism for molecular carcinogenicity prediction.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2023Article
- Predicting Dose-Range Chemical Toxicity using Novel Hybrid Deep Machine-Learning Method.Toxics · 2022Article
- Predicting Chemical Carcinogens Using a Hybrid Neural Network Deep Learning Method.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- DeepCarc: Deep Learning-Powered Carcinogenicity Prediction Using Model-Level Representation.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2021Article
- CarcinoPred-EL: Novel models for predicting the carcinogenicity of chemicals using molecular fingerprints and ensemble learning methods.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- A clinical risk stratification tool for predicting treatment resistance in major depressive disorder.Biological psychiatry · 2013Article
- High-Dimensional descriptor selection and computational QSAR modeling for antitumor activity of ARC-111 analogues Based on Support Vector Regression (SVR).International journal of molecular sciences · 2012Article
- Which is a more accurate predictor in colorectal survival analysis? Nine data mining algorithms vs. the TNM staging system.PloS one · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Carcinogenicity Reliability Database (CRDB) was constructed by collecting experimental carcinogenicity data on about 1,500 chemicals from six sources, including IARC, and NTP databases, and then by ranking their reliabilities into six unified categories. A wide variety of 911 organic chemicals were selected from the database for QSAR modeling, and 1,504 kinds of different molecular descriptors were calculated, based on their 3D molecular structures as modeled by the Dragon software. Positive (carcinogenic) and negative (non-carcinogenic) chemicals containing various substructures were counted using atom and functional group count descriptors, and the statistical significance of ratios of positives to negatives was tested for those substructures. Very few were judged to be strongly related to carcinogenicity, among substructures known to be responsible for carcinogens as revealed from biomedical studies. In order to develop QSAR models for the prediction of the carcinogenicities of a wide variety of chemicals with a satisfactory performance level, the relationship between the carcinogenicity data with improved reliability and a subset of significant descriptors selected from 1,504 Dragon descriptors was analyzed with a support vector machine (SVM) method: the classification function (SVC) for weighted data in LIBSVM program was used to classify chemicals into two carcinogenic categories (positive or negative), where weights were set depending on the reliabilities of the carcinogenicity data. The quality and stability of the models presented were tested by performing a dual cross-validation procedure. A single SVM model as the first step was developed for all the 911 chemicals using 250 selected descriptors, achieving an overall accuracy level, i.e., positive and negative correct estimate, of about 70%. In order to improve the accuracy of the final model, the 911 chemicals were classified into 20 mutually overlapping subgroups according to contained substructures, a specific SVM model was optimized for each subgroup, and the predicted carcinogenicities of the 911 chemicals were determined by the majorities of the outputs of the corresponding SVM models. The model developed on the basis of grouping of chemicals into 20 substructures predicts the carcinogenicities of a wide variety of chemicals with a satisfactory overall accuracy of approximately 80%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.