Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20186269›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2010

Expression in aneuploid Drosophila S2 cells.

Yu Zhang, John H Malone, Sara K Powell, Vipul Periwal, Eric Spana, David M Macalpine, Brian Oliver

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 128 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
128citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

128 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Influence of Histone Acetylation on Chromatin 3D Organization inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Expression of EndonucleaseCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Generating CRISPR-edited clonal lines of culturedBiology methods & protocols · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Dosage Compensation inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Effects of aneuploidy on cell behaviour and function.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2022
    Review

68 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yu ZhangLaboratory of Cellular and Developmental Biology, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
John H Malone
Sara K Powell
Vipul Periwal
Eric Spana
David M Macalpine
Brian Oliver

Funding

Drosophila Functional GenomicsZIADK015600 · NIDDK · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES · PI OLIVER, BRIAN · 2009 to 2025
$23.9M
The Systematic Identification and Analysis of Replication Origins in DrosophilaU01HG004279 · NHGRI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MACALPINE, DAVID M · 2007 to 2011
$2.6M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA DK015600NHGRI NIH HHS HG004279NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG004279
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extensive departures from balanced gene dose in aneuploids are highly deleterious. However, we know very little about the relationship between gene copy number and expression in aneuploid cells. We determined copy number and transcript abundance (expression) genome-wide in Drosophila S2 cells by DNA-Seq and RNA-Seq. We found that S2 cells are aneuploid for >43 Mb of the genome, primarily in the range of one to five copies, and show a male genotype ( approximately two X chromosomes and four sets of autosomes, or 2X;4A). Both X chromosomes and autosomes showed expression dosage compensation. X chromosome expression was elevated in a fixed-fold manner regardless of actual gene dose. In engineering terms, the system "anticipates" the perturbation caused by X dose, rather than responding to an error caused by the perturbation. This feed-forward regulation resulted in precise dosage compensation only when X dose was half of the autosome dose. Insufficient compensation occurred at lower X chromosome dose and excessive expression occurred at higher doses. RNAi knockdown of the Male Specific Lethal complex abolished feed-forward regulation. Both autosome and X chromosome genes show Male Specific Lethal-independent compensation that fits a first order dose-response curve. Our data indicate that expression dosage compensation dampens the effect of altered DNA copy number genome-wide. For the X chromosome, compensation includes fixed and dose-dependent components.

Indexed as

AneuploidyAnimalsBlotting, WesternCell LineChromatin ImmunoprecipitationComparative Genomic HybridizationDosage Compensation, GeneticDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsGene Expression RegulationMaleOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisRNA InterferenceSequence Analysis, DNAX ChromosomeDrosophila Proteins

Identifiers

PMID20186269
PMCPMC2826376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.