Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20185571›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2010

Assessing serotonin receptor mRNA editing frequency by a novel ultra high-throughput sequencing method.

Atheir I Abbas, Daniel J Urban, Niels H Jensen, Martilias S Farrell, Wesley K Kroeze, Piotr Mieczkowski, Zefeng Wang, Bryan L Roth

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Adar3 Is Involved in Learning and Memory in Mice.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Serotonin 2c receptor RNA editing in major depression and suicide.The world journal of biological psychiatry : the official journal of the World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry · 2013
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Atheir I AbbasDepartment of Biochemistry, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
Daniel J Urban
Niels H Jensen
Martilias S Farrell
Wesley K Kroeze
Piotr Mieczkowski
Zefeng Wang
Bryan L Roth
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USCase Western Reserve University · US

Funding

MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007250 · NIGMS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI HUANG, ALEX YEE-CHEN · 1985 to 2023
$33.4M
Screening CoreU19MH082441 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI CARON, MARC G., ROTH, BRYAN L. · 2007 to 2016
$15.2M
Targeting and Trafficking of 5-HT2A Serotonin ReceptorsR01MH061887 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ROTH, BRYAN L. · 2000 to 2014
$4.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007250NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH061887NIMH NIH HHS R01MH61887NIMH NIH HHS U19 MH082441NIMH NIH HHS U19MH82441PHS HHS NIMH61887
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RNA editing is a post-transcriptional modification of pre-mRNA that results in increased diversity in transcriptomes and proteomes. It occurs in a wide variety of eukaryotic organisms and in some viruses. One of the most common forms of pre-mRNA editing is A-to-I editing, in which adenosine is deaminated to inosine, which is read as guanosine during translation. This phenomenon has been observed in numerous transcripts, including the mammalian 5-HT(2C) receptor, which can be edited at five distinct sites. Methods used to date to quantify 5-HT(2C) receptor editing are labor-intensive, expensive and provide limited information regarding the relative abundance of 5-HT(2C) receptor editing variants. Here, we present a novel, ultra high-throughput method to quantify 5-HT(2C) receptor editing, compare it to a more conventional method, and use it to assess the effect of a range of genetic and pharmacologic manipulations on 5-HT(2C) editing. We conclude that this new method is powerful and economical, and we provide evidence that alterations in 5-HT(2C) editing appear to be a result of regional changes in brain activity, rather than a mechanism to normalize 5-HT(2C) signaling.

Indexed as

RNA EditingAnimalsDNA, ComplementaryHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysMiceMice, Inbred C57BLReceptor, Serotonin, 5-HT2CRNA, MessengerRNA PrecursorsSequence Analysis, DNADNA, ComplementaryReceptor, Serotonin, 5-HT2CRNA, MessengerRNA Precursors

Identifiers

PMID20185571
PMCPMC2879535
OpenAlexW2023550461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.