Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20184764›Full record

Trial reportBMC pregnancy and childbirth2010

PErineal Assessment and Repair Longitudinal Study (PEARLS): protocol for a matched pair cluster trial.

Debra E Bick, Christine Kettle, Sue Macdonald, Peter W Thomas, Robert K Hills, Khaled M K Ismail

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06711198 (The Effect of Virtual Reality Simulation on Self-Efficacy and Anxiety Levels of Students in Episiotomy Education), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06711198 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Virtual Reality Simulation on Self-Efficacy and Anxiety Levels of Students in Episiotomy Education: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorSakarya UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled95ConditionsEpisiotomy, Virtual SimulationArmsvirtual reality simulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Perineal Lacerations: A Retrospective Study in a Habitual-Risk Public Maternity.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2021
    Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Can pelvic floor injury secondary to delivery be prevented?International urogynecology journal · 2012
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Debra E BickKing's College London, Florence Nightingale School of Nursing and Midwifery, James Clerk Maxwell Building, 57 Waterloo Road, London, UK. debra.bick@kcl.ac.uk
Christine Kettle
Sue Macdonald
Peter W Thomas
Robert K Hills
Khaled M K Ismail
Bournemouth University · GBCardiff University · GBKing's College London · GBRoyal College of Midwives · GBRoyal Stoke University Hospital · GBUniversity of Staffordshire · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Perineal Assessment and Repair Longitudinal Study (PEARLS) is a national clinical quality improvement initiative designed to improve the assessment and management of perineal trauma. Perineal trauma affects around 85% of women who have a vaginal birth in the UK each year and millions more world-wide. Continuous suturing techniques compared with traditional interrupted methods are more effective in reducing pain and postnatal morbidity, however they are not widely used by clinicians despite recommendations of evidence based national clinical guidelines. Perineal suturing skills and postnatal management of trauma remain highly variable within and between maternity units in the UK as well as worldwide. Implementation of a standardised training package to support effective perineal management practices could reduce perineal pain and other related postnatal morbidity for a substantial number of women. METHODS/

designPEARLS is a matched pair cluster trial, which is being conducted in maternity units across the UK. Units within a matched pair will be randomised to implement the study intervention either early or late in the study period. The intervention will include the cascading of a multi-professional training package to enhance midwifery and obstetric skills in the assessment, repair and postnatal management of perineal trauma. Women who have had an episiotomy or second degree perineal tear will be eligible for recruitment. Prior to developing the intervention and deciding on study outcomes, a Delphi survey and a consensus conference were held to identify what women, who previously suffered perineal trauma during childbirth, considered to be important outcomes for them. Findings from this preliminary work (which will be reported elsewhere) and other outcomes including women's experiences of perineal pain and pain on activity, breastfeeding uptake and duration and psychological well-being as assessed using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) will be assessed at 10 days and three months post-birth. DISCUSSION: Implementation of evidence-based perineal assessment and management practices, could lead to significantly improved physical and psychological health outcomes for women in the UK and world-wide.

trial registrationPEARLS is registered with the Current Controlled Trials Registry (no: ISRCTN28960026). NIHR UKCRN portfolio no: 4785.

Indexed as

ObstetricsSuture TechniquesClinical AuditClinical ProtocolsCluster AnalysisEpisiotomyEvidence-Based MedicineFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesObstetric Labor ComplicationsPerineumPostnatal CarePractice Guidelines as TopicPregnancyResearch Design

Identifiers

PMID20184764
PMCPMC2836981
OpenAlexW2066803793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.