Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20182906›Full record

Trial reportInvestigational new drugs2011

Influence of pharmacogenetic variability on the pharmacokinetics and toxicity of the aurora kinase inhibitor danusertib.

Neeltje Steeghs, Ron H J Mathijssen, Judith A M Wessels, Anne-Joy de Graan, Tahar van der Straaten, Mariangela Mariani, Bernard Laffranchi, Silvia Comis, Maja J A de Jonge, Hans Gelderblom and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Investigational new drugs, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. The role of Aurora-A in human cancers and future therapeutics.American journal of cancer research · 2020
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Neeltje SteeghsDepartment of Clinical Oncology, K1-P, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands.
Ron H J Mathijssen
Judith A M Wessels
Anne-Joy de Graan
Tahar van der Straaten
Mariangela Mariani
Bernard Laffranchi
Silvia Comis
Maja J A de Jonge
Hans Gelderblom
Henk-Jan Guchelaar
Leiden University Medical Center · NLErasmus MC · NLNerviano Medical Sciences · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesDanusertib is a serine/threonine kinase inhibitor of multiple kinases, including aurora-A, B, and C. This explorative study aims to identify possible relationships between single nucleotide polymorphisms in genes coding for drug metabolizing enzymes and transporter proteins and clearance of danusertib, to clarify the interpatient variability in exposure. In addition, this study explores the relationship between target receptor polymorphisms and toxicity of danusertib.

methodsFor associations with clearance, 48 cancer patients treated in a phase I study were analyzed for ABCB1, ABCG2 and FMO3 polymorphisms. Association analyses between neutropenia and drug target receptors, including KDR, RET, FLT3, FLT4, AURKB and AURKA, were performed in 30 patients treated at recommended phase II dose-levels in three danusertib phase I or phase II trials.

resultsNo relationships between danusertib clearance and drug metabolizing enzymes and transporter protein polymorphisms were found. Only, for the one patient with FMO3 18281AA polymorphism, a significantly higher clearance was noticed, compared to patients carrying at least 1 wild type allele. No effect of target receptor genotypes or haplotypes on neutropenia was observed.

conclusionsAs we did not find any major correlations between pharmacogenetic variability in the studied enzymes and transporters and pharmacokinetics nor toxicity, it is unlikely that danusertib is highly susceptible for pharmacogenetic variation. Therefore, no dosing alterations of danusertib are expected in the future, based on the polymorphisms studied. However, the relationship between FMO3 polymorphisms and clearance of danusertib warrants further research, as we could study only a small group of patients.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnalysis of VarianceAntineoplastic AgentsAurora Kinase AAurora Kinase BAurora KinasesBenzamidesFemaleHaplotypesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingPharmacogeneticsPolymorphism, GeneticAntineoplastic AgentsAURKA protein, humanAURKB protein, humanAurora Kinase AAurora Kinase BAurora KinasesBenzamidesdanusertibProtein Kinase InhibitorsProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesPyrazoles

Identifiers

PMID20182906
PMCPMC3160560
OpenAlexW2160069147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.