Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20182797›Full record

ArticlePharmacy world & science : PWS2010

Views of parents and pharmacists following participation in a paediatric pharmacovigilance study.

Mansour Tobaiqy, Derek Stewart, Peter J Helms, Christine M Bond, Amanda Jane Lee, James McLay

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacy world & science : PWS, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Parental reporting of adverse drug reactions in South Africa: An online survey.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2021
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mansour TobaiqyDivision of Applied Health Sciences, The Aberdeen Medical School, The University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK.
Derek Stewart
Peter J Helms
Christine M Bond
Amanda Jane Lee
James McLay

Funding

Chief Scientist Office CZG/2/267
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore the experiences and views of community pharmacists and parents participating in a prospective paediatric pharmacovigilance study.

methodTwenty-five pharmacists and 32 parents were approached for telephone interview. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and analysed thematically to identify recurring issues and themes.

resultsSeventeen pharmacists and 22 parents were interviewed. Parents and pharmacists agreed that more information about the side effects of medicines in children was required. Both groups reported willingness to participate in future prospective pharmacovigilance studies, although pharmacists expressed concerns about the lack of financial incentives. Pharmacists reported that parents had concerns regarding the confidentiality of their child's ADR data and the study data collection process.

conclusionThis study highlighted positive and negative opinions of parents and pharmacists regarding their experiences in this research project. Maintaining confidentiality in relation to indication and medicines prescribed were important issues for parents whereas time constraints and lack of financial incentives were key issues influencing participation by community pharmacists.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsParentsPharmacistsCommunity Pharmacy ServicesHumansInterviews as TopicProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID20182797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.