Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20182625›Full record

ReviewCold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology2010

Bioenergetics and life's origins.

David Deamer, Arthur L Weber

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The master molecule that built biology: How water shaped the chemistry of life.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026
    Review
  2. Rocky Planets as Heat Engines.Space science reviews · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Light-Responsive Mononucleotide Coacervates.Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Protocellular Heme and Iron-Sulfur Clusters.Accounts of chemical research · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

David DeamerDepartment of Biomolecular Engineering, Baskin School of Engineering, University of California, Santa Cruz, California 95064, USA. deamer@soe.ucsc.edu
Arthur L Weber

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bioenergetics is central to our understanding of living systems, yet has attracted relatively little attention in origins of life research. This article focuses on energy resources available to drive primitive metabolism and the synthesis of polymers that could be incorporated into molecular systems having properties associated with the living state. The compartmented systems are referred to as protocells, each different from all the rest and representing a kind of natural experiment. The origin of life was marked when a rare few protocells happened to have the ability to capture energy from the environment to initiate catalyzed heterotrophic growth directed by heritable genetic information in the polymers. This article examines potential sources of energy available to protocells, and mechanisms by which the energy could be used to drive polymer synthesis.

Indexed as

Energy MetabolismAnimalsCatalysisDiphosphatesHumansKineticsLifeModels, BiologicalOrigin of LifePolymersSunlightThermodynamicsDiphosphatesPolymers

Identifiers

PMID20182625
PMCPMC2828274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.