Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20182621›Full record

ReviewCold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology2010

Rho and Ras GTPases in axon growth, guidance, and branching.

Alan Hall, Giovanna Lalli

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 241 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
241citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

241 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Transcriptomic Analysis ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Transcriptomic Analysis ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

181 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alan HallMemorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, Cell Biology Program, New York, New York 10065, USA.
Giovanna Lalli

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The establishment of precise neuronal cell morphology provides the foundation for all aspects of neurobiology. During development, axons emerge from cell bodies after an initial polarization stage, elongate, and navigate towards target regions guided by a range of environmental cues. The Rho and Ras families of small GTPases have emerged as critical players at all stages of axonogenesis. Their ability to coordinately direct multiple signal transduction pathways with precise spatial control drives many of the activities that underlie this morphogenetic program: the dynamic assembly, disassembly, and reorganization of the actin and microtubule cytoskeletons, the interaction of the growing axon with other cells and extracellular matrix, the delivery of lipids and proteins to the axon through the exocytic machinery, and the internalization of membrane and proteins at the leading edge of the growth cone through endocytosis. This article highlights the contribution of Rho and Ras GTPases to axonogenesis.

Indexed as

AllelesAnimalsAxonsDrosophilaEndocytosisGrowth ConesHippocampusHumansModels, BiologicalMonomeric GTP-Binding ProteinsNeuronsProtein IsoformsRatsrho GTP-Binding ProteinsMonomeric GTP-Binding ProteinsProtein Isoformsrho GTP-Binding Proteins

Identifiers

PMID20182621
PMCPMC2828272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.