Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20181620›Full record

ArticleBiology of reproduction2010

Development of monozygotic twin mouse embryos from the time of blastomere separation at the two-cell stage to blastocyst.

Mika Katayama, Mark R Ellersieck, R Michael Roberts

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology of reproduction, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Embryonic scaling: morphogen gradients, size sensing, and scaler genes.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Mouse and human embryonic genome activation initiate at the one-cell stage.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Totipotency: what it is and what it is not.Stem cells and development · 2014
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Trophoblast stem cells.Biology of reproduction · 2011
    Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mika KatayamaDivision of Animal Sciences, and Christopher S. Bond Life Sciences Center, University of Missouri, 1201 E. Rollins Street, Columbia, MO 65211, USA.
Mark R Ellersieck
R Michael Roberts
University of Missouri · USSt Christopher's Hospice · GB

Funding

INTERACTION BETWEEN BLASTOCYST AND UTERINE ENDOMETRIUMR01HD021896 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI ROBERTS, R. MICHAEL · 1986 to 2010
$2.8M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD021896NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD21896-23
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of blastomeres separated from two-cell stage murine embryos has been compared. Blastomeres were removed from the zona pellucida (ZP) and cultured individually; the twin embryos were compared during their progression to blastocyst in terms of development rate, cell number, morphology, conformation at the four-cell stage, and CDX2 and POU5F1 (also known as OCT4) expression. In general, twin embryos, whether obtained from superovulated or normally bred dams, displayed comparable cell numbers as they advanced. They formed morulae and blastocysts more or less synchronously with each other and with control embryos, although possessing about half of the latter's cell number. Despite this apparent synchrony, the majority of twin blastocysts differed in terms of their relative complements of POU5F1+/CDX2- cells, which represent inner cell mass (ICM), and POU5F1+/CDX2+ cells, which identify trophectoderm (TE). Many, but not all, exhibited a disproportionately small ICM. By contrast, demiembryos retained within their ZP and created by randomly damaging one of the two blastomeres in two-cell stage embryos exhibited a more normal ratio of ICM to TE cells at blastocyst and significantly less variance in ICM cell number. One possible explanation is that ZP-free demiembryos only infrequently adopt the same conformation as their partners, including the favorable tetrahedral form, at the four-cell stage, suggesting that such embryos exhibit a high degree of plasticity with regard to the orientation of their first two cleavage planes and that a significant number likely deviate from paths that provide an optimal geometric progression to blastocyst. These data could explain the difficulty of creating monozygotic twins from two-cell stage embryos.

Indexed as

SuperovulationTwins, MonozygoticAnimalsBlastocystBlastocyst Inner Cell MassBlastomeresCDX2 Transcription FactorFemaleHomeodomain ProteinsMaleMiceMorulaOctamer Transcription Factor-3PregnancyTranscription FactorsZona PellucidaCdx2 protein, mouseCDX2 Transcription FactorHomeodomain ProteinsOctamer Transcription Factor-3Pou5f1 protein, mouseTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID20181620
PMCPMC2874505
OpenAlexW2154008045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.