ArticleBMC systems biology2010
Dynamical modeling of microRNA action on the protein translation process.
Article in BMC systems biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.
- An entropy-based method to control COVID-19 rumors in online social networks using opinion leaders.Technology in society · 2022Article
- Systemic CLIP-seq analysis and game theory approach to model microRNA mode of binding.Nucleic acids research · 2021Article
- A mathematical model as a tool to identify microRNAs with highest impact on transcriptome changes.BMC genomics · 2019Article
- Mechanistic Computational Models of MicroRNA-Mediated Signaling Networks in Human Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Review
- Understanding microRNA-mediated gene regulatory networks through mathematical modelling.Nucleic acids research · 2016Article
- PHLPP2 Downregulation Contributes to Lung Carcinogenesis Following B[a]P/B[a]PDE Exposure.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2015Article
- A Large-Scale Analysis of Genetic Variants within Putative miRNA Binding Sites in Prostate Cancer.Cancer discovery · 2015Article
- The effect of microRNAs in the regulation of human CYP3A4: a systematic study using a mathematical model.Scientific reports · 2014Article
- mRNA translation and protein synthesis: an analysis of different modelling methodologies and a new PBN based approach.BMC systems biology · 2014Article
- Minireview: miRomics in endocrinology: a novel approach for modeling endocrine diseases.Molecular endocrinology (Baltimore, Md.) · 2013Review
- Model composition through model reduction: a combined model of CD95 and NF-κB signaling pathways.BMC systems biology · 2013Article
- Computational analysis of target hub gene repression regulated by multiple and cooperative miRNAs.Nucleic acids research · 2012Article
- Kinetic signatures of microRNA modes of action.RNA (New York, N.Y.) · 2012Article
- Integrated microRNA and mRNA expression profiling in a rat colon carcinogenesis model: effect of a chemo-protective diet.Physiological genomics · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundProtein translation is a multistep process which can be represented as a cascade of biochemical reactions (initiation, ribosome assembly, elongation, etc.), the rate of which can be regulated by small non-coding microRNAs through multiple mechanisms. It remains unclear what mechanisms of microRNA action are the most dominant: moreover, many experimental reports deliver controversial messages on what is the concrete mechanism actually observed in the experiment. Nissan and Parker have recently demonstrated that it might be impossible to distinguish alternative biological hypotheses using the steady state data on the rate of protein synthesis. For their analysis they used two simple kinetic models of protein translation.
resultsIn contrary to the study by Nissan and Parker, we show that dynamical data allow discriminating some of the mechanisms of microRNA action. We demonstrate this using the same models as developed by Nissan and Parker for the sake of comparison but the methods developed (asymptotology of biochemical networks) can be used for other models. We formulate a hypothesis that the effect of microRNA action is measurable and observable only if it affects the dominant system (generalization of the limiting step notion for complex networks) of the protein translation machinery. The dominant system can vary in different experimental conditions that can partially explain the existing controversy of some of the experimental data.
conclusionsOur analysis of the transient protein translation dynamics shows that it gives enough information to verify or reject a hypothesis about a particular molecular mechanism of microRNA action on protein translation. For multiscale systems only that action of microRNA is distinguishable which affects the parameters of dominant system (critical parameters), or changes the dominant system itself. Dominant systems generalize and further develop the old and very popular idea of limiting step. Algorithms for identifying dominant systems in multiscale kinetic models are straightforward but not trivial and depend only on the ordering of the model parameters but not on their concrete values. Asymptotic approach to kinetic models allows putting in order diverse experimental observations in complex situations when many alternative hypotheses co-exist.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.