Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20180137›Full record

ReviewPediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)2010

C1q nephropathy in the pediatric population: pathology and pathogenesis.

Scott E Wenderfer, Rita D Swinford, Michael C Braun

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The natural history of immunoglobulin M nephropathy in adults.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2017
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. [Advances in clinical research on C1q nephropathy].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2016
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. C1q nephropathy in children: clinical characteristics and outcome.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2014
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Scott E WenderferDivision of Pediatric Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas School of Medicine, Houston, USA.
Rita D Swinford
Michael C Braun
The University of Texas at Austin · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

C1q nephropathy was originally described nearly 25 years ago by Jennette and Hipp. Since that time there have been a limited number of publications on C1q nephropathy, most of them in the pediatric literature. Despite reported incidences as high as 16% in some pediatric biopsy series, a consensus definition on the diagnosis of C1q nephropathy is lacking and its existence as a distinct clinical disease entity remains controversial. The purpose of this review is to discuss the biology of C1q in the context of mechanisms of C1q deposition, and to provide a detailed analysis of the published pediatric case series with a focus on the pathological criteria used to establish the diagnosis of C1q nephropathy as well as long-term outcomes in children.

Indexed as

BiopsyChildChronic DiseaseGlomerulonephritisHumansKidney DiseasesPopulation Groups

Identifiers

PMID20180137
OpenAlexW2029755006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.