ReviewInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2010
Optimum slicing of radical prostatectomy specimens for correlation between histopathology and medical images.
Review in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Preoperative imaging accuracy in size determination of prostate cancer in men undergoing radical prostatectomy for clinically localised disease.Insights into imaging · 2023Article
- Direct correlation of MRI with histopathology in pediatric renal tumors through the use of a patient-specific 3-D-printed cutting guide: a feasibility study.Pediatric radiology · 2023Article
- Registration Accuracy of Patient-Specific, Three-Dimensional-Printed Prostate Molds for Correlating Pathology With Magnetic Resonance Imaging.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2019Article
- MR Imaging-Histology Correlation by Tailored 3D-Printed Slicer in Oncological Assessment.Contrast media & molecular imaging · 2019Review
- Accurate validation of ultrasound imaging of prostate cancer: a review of challenges in registration of imaging and histopathology.Journal of ultrasound · 2018Review
- Review: in vivo optical spectral tissue sensing-how to go from research to routine clinical application?Lasers in medical science · 2017Review
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging Underestimation of Prostate Cancer Geometry: Use of Patient Specific Molds to Correlate Images with Whole Mount Pathology.The Journal of urology · 2017Article
- A system for evaluating magnetic resonance imaging of prostate cancer using patient-specific 3D printed molds.American journal of clinical and experimental urology · 2014Article
- Challenges in accurate registration of 3-D medical imaging and histopathology in primary prostate cancer.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2013Review
- 3D prostate histology image reconstruction: Quantifying the impact of tissue deformation and histology section location.Journal of pathology informatics · 2013Article
- Imaging of prostate cancer: a platform for 3D co-registration of in-vivo MRI ex-vivo MRI and pathology.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2012Article
- Use of patient-specific MRI-based prostate mold for validation of multiparametric MRI in localization of prostate cancer.Urology · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThere is a need for methods which enable precise correlation of histologic sections with in vivo prostate images. Such methods would allow direct comparison between imaging features and functional or histopathological heterogeneity of tumors. Correlation would be particularly useful for validating the accuracy of imaging modalities, developing imaging techniques, assessing image-guided therapy, etc. An optimum prostate slicing method for accurate correlation between the histopathological and medical imaging planes in terms of section angle, thickness and level was sought.
methodsLiterature review (51 references from 1986-2009 were cited) was done on the various sectioning apparatus or techniques used to slice the prostate specimen for accurate correlation between histopathological data and medical imaging. Technology evaluation was performed with review and discussion of various methods used to section other organs and their possible applications for sectioning prostatectomy specimens.
resultsNo consensus has been achieved on how the prostate should be dissected to achieve a good correlation. Various customized sectioning instruments and techniques working with different mechanism are used in different research institutes to improve the correlation. Some of the methods have convincingly shown significant potential for improving image-specimen correlation. However, the semisolid consistent property of prostate tissue and the lack of identifiable landmarks remain challenges to be overcome, especially for fresh prostate sectioning and microtomy without external fiducials.
conclusionsA standardized optimum protocol to dissect prostatectomy specimens is needed for the validation of medical imaging modalities by histologic correlation. These standards can enhance disease management by improving the comparability between different modalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
20180036What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.