Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20180031›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2010

Extended esophagectomy in elderly patients with esophageal cancer: minor effect of age alone in determining the postoperative course and survival.

B B Pultrum, D J Bosch, M W N Nijsten, M G G Rodgers, H Groen, J P J Slaets, J Th M Plukker

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 104 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Outcomes of curative esophageal cancer surgery in elderly: A meta-analysis.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Changes in the nutritional status of elderly patients after esophagectomy.Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Influence of Patients' Age in the Utilization of Esophagectomy for Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A · 2019
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

B B PultrumDepartment of Surgery/Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. b.b.pultrum@chir.umcg.nl
D J Bosch
M W N Nijsten
M G G Rodgers
H Groen
J P J Slaets
J Th M Plukker
University of Groningen · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundElderly patients who undergo esophagectomy for cancer often have a high prevalence of coexisting diseases, which may adversely affect their postoperative course. We determined the relationship of advanced age (i.e., > or =70 years) with outcome and evaluated age as a selection criterion for surgery.

methodsBetween January 1991 and January 2007, we performed a curative-intent extended transthoracic esophagectomy in 234 patients with cancer of the esophagus. Patients were divided into two age groups: <70 years (group I; 170 patients) and > or =70 years (group II; 64 patients).

resultsBoth groups were comparable regarding comorbidity (American Society of Anesthesiologists classification), and tumor and surgical characteristics. The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 6.2% (group I, 5%, vs. group II, 11%, P = 0.09). Advanced age was not a prognostic factor for developing postoperative complications (odds ratio, 1.578; 95% confidence interval, 0.857-2.904; P = 0.143). The overall number of complications was equal with 58% in group I vs. 69% in group II (P = 0.142). Moreover, the occurrence of complications in elderly patients did not influence survival (P = 0.174). Recurrences developed more in patients <70 years (58% vs. 42%, P = 0.028). The overall 5-year survival was 35%, and, when included, postoperative mortality was 33% in both groups (P = 0.676).The presence of comorbidity was an independent prognostic factor for survival (P = 0.002).

conclusionsAdvanced age (> or =70 years) has minor influence on postoperative course, recurrent disease, and survival in patients who underwent an extended esophagectomy. Age alone is not a prognostic indicator for survival. We propose that a radical resection should not be withheld in elderly patients with limited frailty and comorbidity.

Indexed as

EsophagectomyFrail ElderlyAdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsCarcinoma, Squamous CellEsophageal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSurvival Analysis

Identifiers

PMID20180031
PMCPMC2868167
OpenAlexW2112797428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.