Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20179966›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of pediatrics2010

Clinical practice : noninvasive respiratory support in newborns.

J Peter de Winter, Machteld A G de Vries, Luc J I Zimmermann

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of pediatrics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Cardiorespiratory transition in CDH.Seminars in fetal & neonatal medicine · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Resource utilization patterns using non-invasive ventilation in neonates with respiratory distress syndrome.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

J Peter de WinterDepartment of Pediatrics, Spaarne Hospital, Hoofddorp, The Netherlands. pdewinter@spaarneziekenhuis.nl
Machteld A G de Vries
Luc J I Zimmermann

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The most important goal of introducing noninvasive ventilation (NIV) has been to decrease the need for intubation and, therefore, mechanical ventilation in newborns. As a result, this technique may reduce the incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). In addition to nasal CPAP, improvements in sensors and flow delivery systems have resulted in the introduction of a variety of other types of NIV. For the optimal application of these novelties, a thorough physiological knowledge of mechanics of the respiratory system is necessary. In this overview, the modern insights of noninvasive respiratory therapy in newborns are discussed. These aspects include respiratory support in the delivery room; conventional and modern nCPAP; humidified, heated, and high-flow nasal cannula ventilation; and nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation. Finally, an algorithm is presented describing common practice in taking care of respiratory distress in prematurely born infants.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsContinuous Positive Airway PressureHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureIntermittent Positive-Pressure VentilationLaryngeal MasksPositive-Pressure RespirationRespiratory Mechanics

Identifiers

PMID20179966
PMCPMC2876262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.