Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20178633›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2010

How does community context influence coalitions in the formation stage? A multiple case study based on the Community Coalition Action Theory.

Michelle C Kegler, Jessica Rigler, Sally Honeycutt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Assessing a Community Partnership Addressing Food Security Among Older Adults During COVID-19.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. A Community-Based Participatory Action Research for Roma Health Justice in a Deprived District in Spain.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. A statewide evaluation of seven strategies to reduce opioid overdose in North Carolina.Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention · 2018
    Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michelle C KeglerEmory Prevention Research Center, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA. mkegler@sph.emory.edu
Jessica Rigler
Sally Honeycutt

Funding

Emory University Prevention Research CenterU48DP000043 · DP · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI GLANZ, KAREN · 2004 to 2009
$7.0M
NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP 000043
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCommunity coalitions are rooted in complex and dynamic community systems. Despite recognition that environmental factors affect coalition behavior, few studies have examined how community context impacts coalition formation. Using the Community Coalition Action theory as an organizing framework, the current study employs multiple case study methodology to examine how five domains of community context affect coalitions in the formation stage of coalition development. Domains are history of collaboration, geography, community demographics and economic conditions, community politics and history, and community norms and values.

methodsData were from 8 sites that participated in an evaluation of a healthy cities and communities initiative in California. Twenty-three focus groups were conducted with coalition members, and 76 semi-structured interviews were conducted with local coordinators and coalition leaders. Cross-site analyses were conducted to identify the ways contextual domains influenced selection of the lead agency, coalition membership, staffing and leadership, and coalition processes and structures.

resultsHistory of collaboration influenced all four coalition factors examined, from lead agency selection to coalition structure. Geography influenced coalition formation largely through membership and staffing, whereas the demographic and economic makeup of the community had an impact on coalition membership, staffing, and infrastructure for coalition processes. The influence of community politics, history, norms and values was most noticeable on coalition membership.

conclusionsFindings contribute to an ecologic and theory-based understanding of the range of ways community context influences coalitions in their formative stage.

Indexed as

Capacity BuildingAdministrative PersonnelCaliforniaCooperative BehaviorEconomicsHealth Care CoalitionsHumansInterviews as TopicLeadershipModels, TheoreticalOrganizational Case StudiesOrganizational InnovationPoliticsProgram DevelopmentProgram EvaluationResidence Characteristics

Identifiers

PMID20178633
PMCPMC2842234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.