Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20178629›Full record

ArticleCell division2010

Timing is everything: cell cycle control of Rad52.

Jacqueline H Barlow, Rodney Rothstein

Open access · goldAbstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Cell division, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Cancers · 2019
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Endocrine connections · 2017
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Homologous recombination and its regulation.Nucleic acids research · 2012
    Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jacqueline H BarlowDepartment of Genetics & Development, Columbia University Medical Center, 701 West 168th Street, HHSC 1608, New York, NY 10032-2704, USA. rothstein@cancercenter.columbia.edu.
Rodney Rothstein
Columbia University Irving Medical Center · USNational Cancer Institute · US

Funding

Mechanism of spontaneous and DSB-induced repairR37GM050237 · NIGMS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI ROTHSTEIN, RODNEY J. · 2005 to 2014
$6.0M
Genetics of the formation of repair &reombination fociR01GM067055 · NIGMS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI ROTHSTEIN, RODNEY J. · 2003 to 2014
$4.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM067055NIGMS NIH HHS R37 GM050237
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Regulation of the repair of DNA double-strand breaks by homologous recombination is extremely important for both cell viability and the maintenance of genomic integrity. Modulation of double-strand break repair in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae involves controlling the recruitment of one of the central recombination proteins, Rad52, to sites of DNA lesions. The Rad52 protein, which plays a role in strand exchange and the annealing of single strand DNA, is positively regulated upon entry into S phase, repressed during the intra-S phase checkpoint, and undergoes posttranslational modification events such as phosphorylation and sumoylation. These processes all contribute to the timing of Rad52 recruitment, its stability and function. Here, we summarize the regulatory events affecting the Rad52 protein and discuss how this regulation impacts DNA repair and cell survival.

Identifiers

PMID20178629
PMCPMC2838861
OpenAlexW2162563374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.