Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20178043›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in investigational drugs (London, England : 2000)2010

Angiogenesis, neurogenesis and brain recovery of function following injury.

Ye Xiong, Asim Mahmood, Michael Chopp

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in investigational drugs (London, England : 2000), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 183 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
183citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
13.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

183 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 289 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pleiotropic Effects of Exosomes as a Therapy for Stroke Recovery.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Small-Molecule Trk Agonists: Where Do We Go from Here?Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Revisiting the critical roles of reactive microglia in traumatic brain injury.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2025
    Review
  15. Physiological Modeling of the Vascularized Human Lung Organoid.American journal of respiratory cell and molecular biology · 2025
    Article
  16. Neural stem cell heterogeneity in adult hippocampus.Cell regeneration (London, England) · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

123 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ye XiongHenry Ford Health System, Department of Neurology, E&R Building, 2799 West Grand Boulevard, Detroit, MI 48202, USA.
Asim Mahmood
Michael Chopp
Henry Ford Health System · US

Funding

PREDICTION OF HUMAN BRAIN INFARCTION BY MRIP01NS023393 · NINDS · HENRY FORD HOSPITAL · PI ZHANG, ZHENG GANG · 1986 to 2011
$11.0M
Treatment of Traumatic Brain Injury with Marrow Stromal CellsP01NS042345 · NINDS · HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM · PI ZHANG, ZHENG GANG · 2003 to 2007
$6.1M
TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY AND MARROW STROMAL CELLSR01NS042259 · NINDS · HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM · PI MAHMOOD, ASIM · 2002 to 2009
$2.2M
Treatment of 'Traumatic Brain Injury with ErythropoietinR01NS062002 · NINDS · HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM · PI XIONG, YE · 2008 to 2011
$1.1M
NINDS NIH HHS P01 NS023393NINDS NIH HHS P01 NS042345NINDS NIH HHS P01 NS23393NINDS NIH HHS P01 NS42345NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS042259NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS062002NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS42259NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS62002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stroke and traumatic brain injury (TBI) are major causes of mortality and morbidity worldwide. Unfortunately, almost all phase III clinical trials of neuroprotective agents for stroke and TBI have demonstrated no benefit, raising concerns regarding the use of neuroprotective strategies alone as therapy for acute brain injuries. Therefore, a compelling need exists to develop treatments that promote both the repair and regeneration of injured brain tissue, and functional recovery. Recent data suggest that strategies to enhance neurogenesis and angiogenesis following brain injuries may provide promising opportunities to improve clinical outcomes and brain functional recovery. This review discusses neurogenesis and angiogenesis in the adult brain following stroke or TBI. Selected cell-based and pharmacological therapies are highlighted that promote neurogenesis and angiogenesis and are designed to restore neurological function after brain injuries. These discoveries emphasize the need for an improved understanding of injury- and therapy-induced neurogenesis and angiogenesis in the adult brain, and suggest that the manipulation of endogenous neural precursors and endothelial cells is a potential therapy for brain injury.

Indexed as

Adult Stem CellsAnimalsBrain InjuriesHumansNeovascularization, PhysiologicNeurogenesisStroke

Identifiers

PMID20178043
PMCPMC2836170
OpenAlexW1534479115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.