Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20177763›Full record

ArticleJournal of computational neuroscience2010

Computational modeling of GABAA receptor-mediated paired-pulse inhibition in the dentate gyrus.

Peter Jedlicka, Thomas Deller, Stephan W Schwarzacher

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computational neuroscience, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Peter JedlickaInstitute of Clinical Neuroanatomy, Goethe-University, NeuroScience Center, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. jedlicka@em.uni-frankfurt.de
Thomas Deller
Stephan W Schwarzacher
Goethe University Frankfurt · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Paired-pulse inhibition (PPI) of the population spike observed in extracellular field recordings is widely used as a read-out of hippocampal network inhibition. PPI reflects GABA(A) receptor-mediated inhibition of principal neurons through local interneurons. However, because of its polysynaptic nature, it is difficult to assign PPI changes to precise synaptic mechanisms. Here we used a detailed network model of the dentate gyrus to simulate PPI of granule cell action potentials and analyze its network properties. Our computational analysis indicates that PPI results mainly from a combination of perisomatic feed-forward and feedback inhibition of granule cells by basket cells. Feed-forward inhibition mediated by basket cells appeared to be the most significant source of PPI. Our simulations suggest that PPI depends more on somatic than on dendritic inhibition of granule cells. Furthermore, PPI was modulated by changes in GABA(A) reversal potential (E(GABA)) and by alterations in intrinsic excitability of granule cells. In summary, computer modeling provides a useful tool for determining the role of synaptic and intrinsic cellular mechanisms in paired-pulse field potential responses.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAnimalsComputer SimulationDendritesDentate GyrusElectrophysiological PhenomenaEvoked PotentialsFeedback, PhysiologicalIon Channel GatingMembrane PotentialsNerve NetNeuronsRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyReceptors, AMPAReceptors, GABA-AReceptors, AMPAReceptors, GABA-ASodium Channels

Identifiers

PMID20177763
OpenAlexW2089387097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.