Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20177676›Full record

ReviewCancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII2010

MHC-based detection of antigen-specific CD8+ T cell responses.

Sine Reker Hadrup, Ton N Schumacher

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. T-cell responses to oncogenic merkel cell polyomavirus proteins distinguish patients with merkel cell carcinoma from healthy donors.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2014
    Article
  11. The human leukocyte antigen-presented ligandome of B lymphocytes.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2013
    Article
  12. Article
  13. The promised land of human immunology.Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology · 2013
    Article
  14. Missing: a diagnostic technique to enumerate antigen-specific T cells.Critical reviews in oncology/hematology · 2012
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sine Reker HadrupDepartment of Hematology, Center for Cancer Immune Therapy, CCIT, University Hospital Herlev, Herlev, Denmark. sireha02@heh.regionh.dk
Ton N Schumacher
Herlev Hospital · DKOncode Institute · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The hallmark of adaptive immunity is its ability to recognise a wide range of antigens and technologies that capture this diversity are therefore of substantial interest. New methods have recently been developed that allow the parallel analysis of T cell reactivity against vast numbers of different epitopes in limited biological material. These technologies are based on the joint binding of differentially labelled MHC multimers on the T cell surface, thereby providing each antigen-specific T cell population with a unique multicolour code. This strategy of 'combinatorial encoding' enables detection of many (at least 25) different T cell populations per sample and should be of broad value for both T cell epitope identification and immunomonitoring.

Indexed as

Epitope MappingAnimalsAntigensCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesHistocompatibility AntigensHumansMonitoring, ImmunologicProtein BindingProtein MultimerizationT-Lymphocyte SubsetsAntigensHistocompatibility Antigens

Identifiers

PMID20177676
PMCPMC2892606
OpenAlexW1995541175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.