Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20176908›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2010

Pharmacokinetics of cefotaxime and desacetylcefotaxime in infants during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Maurice J Ahsman, Enno D Wildschut, Dick Tibboel, Ron A Mathot

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Cefepime Extraction by Extracorporeal Life Support Circuits.The journal of extra-corporeal technology · 2022
    Article
  7. Population pharmacokinetics of cefotaxime in intensive care patients.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Amiodarone Extraction by the Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Circuit.The journal of extra-corporeal technology · 2021
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Antifungal Extraction by the Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Circuit.The journal of extra-corporeal technology · 2017
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maurice J AhsmanDepartment of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Enno D Wildschut
Dick Tibboel
Ron A Mathot

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is used to temporarily sustain cardiac and respiratory function in critically ill infants but can cause pharmacokinetic changes necessitating dose modifications. Cefotaxime (CTX) is used to prevent and treat infections during ECMO, but the current dose regimen is based on pharmacokinetic data obtained for non-ECMO patients. The objective of this study was to validate the standard dose regimen of 50 mg/kg of body weight twice a day (postnatal age [PNA], <1 week), 50 mg/kg three times a day (PNA, 1 to 4 weeks), or 37.5 mg/kg four times a day (PNA, >4 weeks). We included 37 neonates on ECMO, with a median (range) PNA of 3.3 (0.67 to 199) days and a median (range) body weight of 3.5 (2.0 to 6.2) kg at the onset of ECMO. Median (range) ECMO duration was 108 (16 to 374) h. Plasma samples were taken during routine care, and pharmacokinetic analysis of CTX and its active metabolite, desacetylcefotaxime (DACT), was done using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling (NONMEM). A one-compartment pharmacokinetic model for CTX and DACT adequately described the data. During ECMO, CTX clearance (CL(CTX)) was 0.36 liter/h (range, 0.19 to 0.75 liter/h), the volume of distribution of CTX (V(CTX)) was 1.82 liters (0.73 to 3.02 liters), CL(DACT) was 1.46 liters/h (0.48 to 5.93 liters/h), and V(DACT) was 11.0 liters (2.32 to 28.0 liters). Elimination half-lives for CTX and DACT were 3.5 h (1.6 to 6.8 h) and 5.4 h (0.8 to 14 h). Peak CTX concentration was 98.0 mg/liter (33.2 to 286 mg/liter). DACT concentration varied between 0 and 38.2 mg/liter, with a median of 10 mg/liter in the first 12 h postdose. Overall, CTX concentrations were above the MIC of 8 mg/liter over the entire dose interval. Only 1 of the 37 patients had a sub-MIC concentration for over 50% of the dose interval. In conclusion, the standard cefotaxime dose regimen provides sufficiently long periods of supra-MIC concentrations to provide adequate treatment of infants on ECMO.

Indexed as

Extracorporeal Membrane OxygenationAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteremiaCefotaximeCritical IllnessCross InfectionFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMedical RecordsModels, BiologicalNonlinear DynamicsRespiration, ArtificialAnti-Bacterial AgentsCefotaximedesacetylcefotaxime

Identifiers

PMID20176908
PMCPMC2863660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.