Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20176904›Full record

Trial reportAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2010

Pharmacokinetics of clindamycin in pregnant women in the peripartum period.

Anouk E Muller, Johan W Mouton, Paul M Oostvogel, P Joep Dörr, Rob A Voskuyl, Joost DeJongh, Eric A P Steegers, Meindert Danhof

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Biological sex differences in pharmacokinetics and adverse drug reactions.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Central Nervous System Antimicrobial Exposure and Proposed Dosing for Anthrax Meningitis.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2024
    Article
  8. Neonatal Group B Streptococcus Disease.Pediatrics in review · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Transplacental passage of clindamycin from mother to neonate.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2016
    Article
  12. Pharmacokinetics of drugs in pregnancy.Seminars in perinatology · 2015
    Review
  13. Observational
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Anouk E MullerMedical Centre Haaglanden (MCH), Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Hague, Netherlands. muller.research@Gmail.com
Johan W Mouton
Paul M Oostvogel
P Joep Dörr
Rob A Voskuyl
Joost DeJongh
Eric A P Steegers
Meindert Danhof
Medisch Centrum Haaglanden · NLLeiden University · NLCanisius-Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis · NLErasmus University Rotterdam · NLPNO Consultants (Netherlands) · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study presented here was performed to determine the pharmacokinetics of intravenously administered clindamycin in pregnant women. Seven pregnant women treated with clindamycin were recruited. Maternal blood and arterial and venous umbilical cord blood samples were obtained. Maternal clindamycin concentrations were analyzed by nonlinear mixed-effects modeling with the NONMEM program. The data were best described by a linear three-compartment model. The clearance and the volume of distribution at steady state were 10.0 liters/h and 6.32 x 10(3) liters, respectively. Monte Carlo simulations were performed to determine the area under the concentration curve (AUC) for the free (unbound) drug (f) in maternal serum for 24 h divided by the MIC (fAUC(0-24)/MIC). At a MIC of 0.5 mg/liter, which is the EUCAST breakpoint, the attainment at the lower 95% confidence interval (CI) was 24.6 if the level of protein binding was 65%, and this value concurred well with the target value of 27. However, for higher degrees of protein binding, as has been described in the literature, the attainment was lower, down to 10.2 for a protein binding level of 85% (lower 95% CI). The concentrations in umbilical cord blood were lower than those in maternal blood. The concentration-time profiles in maternal serum indicate that the level of exposure to clindamycin may be too low in these patients. Together with the lower concentrations in umbilical cord blood, this finding suggests that the current dosing regimen may not be adequate to protect all neonates from group B streptococcal disease.

Indexed as

AdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsClindamycinFemaleFetal BloodHumansInfusions, IntravenousModels, BiologicalMonte Carlo MethodPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousStreptococcal InfectionsStreptococcus agalactiaeUmbilical ArteriesUmbilical VeinsAnti-Bacterial AgentsClindamycin

Identifiers

PMID20176904
PMCPMC2863651
OpenAlexW2150505006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.