Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20175778›Full record

SynthesisBrain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland)2010

Glioma pathophysiology: insights emerging from proteomics.

Ruth F Deighton, Richard McGregor, Jocelyn Kemp, James McCulloch, Ian R Whittle

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Brain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. (TS)NeuroImage · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Molecular chaperones in the brain endothelial barrier: neurotoxicity or neuroprotection?FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2019
    Review
  12. Novel management of glioma by molecular therapies, a review article.European journal of translational myology · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ruth F DeightonDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, Western General Hospital and Centre for Cognitive and Neural Systems, University of Edinburgh, Scotland, UK. ruth.deighton@ed.ac.uk
Richard McGregor
Jocelyn Kemp
James McCulloch
Ian R Whittle

Funding

Chief Scientist Office CZB/4/486Medical Research Council G0802238
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proteomics is increasingly employed in both neurological and oncological research to provide insight into the molecular basis of disease but rarely has a coherent, novel pathophysiological insight emerged. Gliomas account for >50% of adult primary intracranial tumors, with malignant gliomas (anaplastic astrocytomas and glioblastoma multiforme) being the most common. In glioma, the application of proteomic technology has identified altered protein expression but without consistency of these alterations or their biological significance being established. A systematic review of multiple independent proteomic analyses of glioma has demonstrated alterations of 99 different proteins. Importantly 10 of the 99 proteins found differentially expressed in glioma [PHB, Hsp20, serum albumin, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), EA-15, RhoGDI, APOA1, GFAP, HSP70, PDIA3] were identified in multiple publications. An assessment of protein-protein interactions between these proteins compiled using novel web-based technology, revealed a robust and cohesive network for glioblastoma. The protein network discovered (containing TP53 and RB1 at its core) compliments recent findings in genomic studies of malignant glioma. The novel perspective provided by network analysis indicates that the potential of this technology to explore crucial aspects of glioma pathophysiology can now be realized but only if the conceptual and technical limitations highlighted in this review are addressed.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBrain NeoplasmsGliomaHumansProhibitinsProteomicsBiomarkers, TumorPHB protein, humanProhibitins

Identifiers

PMID20175778
PMCPMC8094634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.