Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20174950›Full record

Trial reportSurgical endoscopy2010

Different pain scores in single transumbilical incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial.

Evangelos C Tsimoyiannis, Konstantinos E Tsimogiannis, George Pappas-Gogos, Charalampos Farantos, Nikolaos Benetatos, Paraskevi Mavridou, Adamantia Manataki

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Surgical endoscopy, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 138 papers, 17 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
138citing papers in PubMed, 17 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01844960 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2011, after this paper: background citation

A Prospective Double Blinded Randomised Control Trial Comparing Laparoscopic Single Incision Versus Multiple Incision Adjustable Gastric Band Surgery in Patients With Morbid Obesity

TypeinterventionalSponsorKing's College Hospital NHS TrustRan2011 to 2013Enrolled44ConditionsSurgery, Post-operative Pain, Post-operative RecoveryArmsSingle Incision Gastric Band Insertion, Multiple Incision Gastric Band Insertion
NCT03018964 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

A Prospective Multicenter Randomized Controlled Study for The Safety of Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy With a Camera Holder Versus With a Camera Operator

TypeinterventionalSponsorSeoul National University HospitalRan2020 to 2022Enrolled272ConditionsCholecystectomy, LaparoscopicArmsSolo surgery, operation with a camera operator in SILC
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

138 citing papers in PubMed, 17 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Laparoscopic entry techniques.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Fewer-than-four ports versus four ports for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs. conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2012
    Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Pooled it
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

78 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Evangelos C TsimoyiannisDepartments of Surgery, G Hatzikosta General Hospital, Hippocratus 3, Stavraki, GR-45332 Ioannina, Greece.
Konstantinos E Tsimogiannis
George Pappas-Gogos
Charalampos Farantos
Nikolaos Benetatos
Paraskevi Mavridou
Adamantia Manataki

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe attempt to further reduce operative trauma in laparoscopic cholecystectomy has led to new techniques such as natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) and single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS). These new techniques are considered to be painless procedures, but no published studies investigate the possibility of different pain scores in these new techniques versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy. In this randomized control study, we investigated pain scores in SILS cholecystectomy versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy. PATIENTS AND

methodsForty patients (34 women and 6 men) were randomly assigned to two groups. In group A (n = 20) four-port classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed. Patients in group B (n = 20) underwent SILS cholecystectomy. In all patients, preincisional local infiltration of ropivacaine around the trocar wounds was performed. Infusion of ropivacaine solution in the right subdiaphragmatic area at the beginning of the procedure plus normal saline infusion in the same area at the end of the procedure was performed in all patients as well. Shoulder tip and abdominal pain were registered at 2, 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h postoperatively using visual analog scale (VAS).

resultsSignificantly lower pain scores were observed in the SILS group versus the classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy group after the first 12 h for abdominal pain, and after the first 6 h for shoulder pain. Total pain after the first 24 h was nonexistent in the SILS group. Also, requests for analgesics were significantly less in the SILS group, while no difference was observed in incidence of nausea and vomiting between the two groups.

conclusionSILS cholecystectomy, as well as the invisible scar, has significantly lower abdominal and shoulder pain scores, especially after the first 24 h postoperatively, when this pain is nonexistent. (Registration Clinical Trial number: NTC00872287, www.clinicaltrials.gov ).

Indexed as

AdultAgedCholecystectomy, LaparoscopicDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementPostoperative PainProspective StudiesUmbilicus

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.