Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20174842›Full record

ReviewAmino acids2011

Protein scaffold-based molecular probes for cancer molecular imaging.

Zheng Miao, Jelena Levi, Zhen Cheng

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Amino acids, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Beyond Antibodies as Binding Partners: The Role of Antibody Mimetics in Bioanalysis.Annual review of analytical chemistry (Palo Alto, Calif.) · 2017
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. New strategy for monitoring targeted therapy: molecular imaging.International journal of nanomedicine · 2013
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zheng MiaoDepartment of Radiology, Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford, Stanford University, CA 94305-5344, USA.
Jelena Levi
Zhen Cheng

Funding

Radiolabeled RGD Peptides for Breast Cancer Imaging and TherapyR01CA119053 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CHENG, ZHEN · 2007 to 2010
$952k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA119053
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein scaffold molecules are powerful reagents for targeting various cell signal receptors, enzymes, cytokines and other cancer-related molecules. They belong to the peptide and small protein platform with distinct properties. For the purpose of development of new generation molecular probes, various protein scaffold molecules have been labeled with imaging moieties and evaluated both in vitro and in vivo. Among the evaluated probes Affibody molecules and analogs, cystine knot peptides, and nanobodies have shown especially good characteristics as protein scaffold platforms for development of in vivo molecular probes. Quantitative data obtained from positron emission tomography, single photon emission computed tomography/CT, and optical imaging together with biodistribution studies have shown high tumor uptakes and high tumor-to-blood ratios for these probes. High tumor contrast imaging has been obtained within 1 h after injection. The success of those molecular probes demonstrates the adequacy of protein scaffold strategy as a general approach in molecular probe development.

Indexed as

Molecular ProbesProteinsAnimalsBiomarkers, TumorHumansMolecular ImagingNeoplasmsProtein Structure, SecondaryRadionuclide ImagingBiomarkers, TumorMolecular ProbesProteins

Identifiers

PMID20174842
PMCPMC2914822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.