Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20172949›Full record

ArticleCarcinogenesis2010

Polymorphisms of estrogen receptors and risk of biliary tract cancers and gallstones: a population-based study in Shanghai, China.

Sue K Park, Gabriella Andreotti, Asif Rashid, Jinbo Chen, Philip S Rosenberg, Kai Yu, Jennifer Olsen, Yu-Tang Gao, Jie Deng, Lori C Sakoda and 8 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Carcinogenesis, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Journal of Cancer · 2018
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 13 institutions in 4 countries.

Sue K ParkDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institute of Health, EPS-MSC 7234, 6120 Executive Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892-7234, USA.
Gabriella Andreotti
Asif Rashid
Jinbo Chen
Philip S Rosenberg
Kai Yu
Jennifer Olsen
Yu-Tang Gao
Jie Deng
Lori C Sakoda
Mingdong Zhang
Ming-Chang Shen
Bing-Sheng Wang
Tian-Quan Han
Bai-He Zhang
Meredith Yeager
Stephen J Chanock
Ann W Hsing
Cancer Institute (WIA) · INNational Cancer Institute · USShanghai Cancer Institute · CNFudan University Shanghai Cancer Center · CNGeorge Washington University · USNetDragon (United States) · USRuijin Hospital · CNSecond Military Medical University · CNSeoul National University · KRSun Yat-sen University · CNThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Studies of Rare CancersZIACP010158 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI MCGLYNN, KATHERINE · 2009 to 2025
$19.1M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA CP010158NCI NIH HHS N01-CO-12400
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biliary tract cancer encompasses tumors of the gallbladder, bile duct and ampulla of Vater. Gallbladder cancer is more common in women, whereas bile duct cancer is more common in men, suggesting that sex hormones may play a role in the etiology of these cancers. The intracellular action of estrogens is regulated by the estrogen receptor (ESR); thus, we examined the role of common genetic variants in ESR genes on the risk of biliary tract cancers and stones in a population-based case-control study in Shanghai, China (411 cancer cases, 895 stone cases and 786 controls). We genotyped six single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), four in ESR1 (rs2234693, rs3841686, rs2228480 and rs1801132) and two in ESR2 (rs1256049 and rs4986938). In all participants, the ESR1 rs1801132 (P325P) G allele was associated with excess risks of bile duct [odds ratio (OR) = 1.7, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1-2.8] and ampulla of Vater cancers (OR = 2.1, 95% CI 0.9-4.9) compared with the CC genotype. The association with bile duct cancer was apparent among men (OR = 2.8, 95% CI 1.4-5.7) but not among women (P-heterogeneity = 0.01). Also, the ESR2 rs4986938 (38 bp 3' of STP) GG genotype was associated with a higher risk of bile duct cancer (OR = 3.3, 95% CI 1.3-8.7) compared with the AA genotype, although this estimate was based on a small number of subjects. None of the other SNPs examined was associated with biliary tract cancers or stones. False discovery rate-adjusted P-values were not significant (P > 0.1). No association was found for ESR1 haplotype based on four SNPs. These preliminary results suggest that variants in ESR genes could play a role in the etiology of biliary tract cancers, especially bile duct cancer in men.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, Single NucleotideAgedBiliary Tract NeoplasmsBody Mass IndexEstrogen Receptor alphaEstrogen Receptor betaFemaleGallstonesHumansMaleMiddle AgedRiskESR1 protein, humanEstrogen Receptor alphaEstrogen Receptor beta

Identifiers

PMID20172949
PMCPMC2864412
OpenAlexW2143095600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.