ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2010
The impact of genetic relationship information on genomic breeding values in German Holstein cattle.
Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 197 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
197 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Evaluation of the Genetic Variance of Alzheimer's Disease Explained by the Disease-Associated Chromosomal Regions.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2019Pooled it
- Genomic selection in timothy (Phleum pratense L.): a comprehensive evaluation of prediction models, multi-trait strategies, and forward validation across Norwegian environments.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026Article
- Better Multi-Breed Genomic Predictions for Tropical Bull Fertility Using a Breed-Adjusted Genomic Relationship Matrix.Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie · 2026Article
- Stochastic simulations to optimize genomic selection for laying hens: Impact of generation interval and genotyping in the context of extended laying period.Poultry science · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Optimizing genomic predictions in maize using a diversity panel and a multiparental population.The plant genome · 2026Article
- Genomic and hyperspectral imaging-based prediction blending enables selection for reduced deoxynivalenol content in wheat grains.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2025Article
- Genomic prediction for heat and herbicide tolerance in faba bean.The plant genome · 2025Article
- Shared SNP effects across breeds increase the genomic prediction accuracy for numerically small breeds.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Improving genomic prediction for plant disease using environmental covariates.Plant methods · 2025Article
- AdaptiveGS: an explainable genomic selection framework based on adaptive stacking ensemble machine learning.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025Article
- Breaking down data silos across companies to train genome-wide predictions: A feasibility study in wheat.Plant biotechnology journal · 2025Article
- Erosion of estimated genomic breeding values with generations is due to long distance associations between markers and QTL.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2025Article
- Leveraging historical trials to predict Fusarium head blight resistance in spring wheat breeding programs.The plant genome · 2025Article
- Exploiting historical agronomic data to develop genomic prediction strategies for early clonal selection in the Louisiana sugarcane variety development program.The plant genome · 2025Article
- Optimization of sparse phenotyping strategy in multi-environmental trials in maize.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025Article
- Estimation of genetic parameters for mature cow size in North American and Australian Angus cattle.Journal of animal science · 2025Article
- Improved genomic prediction accuracy by genetic relatedness using a crossbred pig population.Translational animal science · 2025Article
- On the inverse association between the number of QTL and the trait-specific genomic relationship of a candidate to the training set.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2024Article
137 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe impact of additive-genetic relationships captured by single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) on the accuracy of genomic breeding values (GEBVs) has been demonstrated, but recent studies on data obtained from Holstein populations have ignored this fact. However, this impact and the accuracy of GEBVs due to linkage disequilibrium (LD), which is fairly persistent over generations, must be known to implement future breeding programs. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe data set used to investigate these questions consisted of 3,863 German Holstein bulls genotyped for 54,001 SNPs, their pedigree and daughter yield deviations for milk yield, fat yield, protein yield and somatic cell score. A cross-validation methodology was applied, where the maximum additive-genetic relationship (amax) between bulls in training and validation was controlled. GEBVs were estimated by a Bayesian model averaging approach (BayesB) and an animal model using the genomic relationship matrix (G-BLUP). The accuracy of GEBVs due to LD was estimated by a regression approach using accuracy of GEBVs and accuracy of pedigree-based BLUP-EBVs.
resultsAccuracy of GEBVs obtained by both BayesB and G-BLUP decreased with decreasing amax for all traits analyzed. The decay of accuracy tended to be larger for G-BLUP and with smaller training size. Differences between BayesB and G-BLUP became evident for the accuracy due to LD, where BayesB clearly outperformed G-BLUP with increasing training size.
conclusionsGEBV accuracy of current selection candidates varies due to different additive-genetic relationships relative to the training data. Accuracy of future candidates can be lower than reported in previous studies because information from close relatives will not be available when selection on GEBVs is applied. A Bayesian model averaging approach exploits LD information considerably better than G-BLUP and thus is the most promising method. Cross-validations should account for family structure in the data to allow for long-lasting genomic based breeding plans in animal and plant breeding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.