ArticleCerebellum (London, England)2010
Representation of movement velocity in the rat's interpositus nucleus during passive forelimb movements.
Article in Cerebellum (London, England), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deep Brain Stimulation of the Interposed Cerebellar Nuclei in a Conditional Genetic Mouse Model with Dystonia.Advances in neurobiology · 2023Article
- Article
- Consensus paper: current views on the role of cerebellar interpositus nucleus in movement control and emotion.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2013Review
- Processing of limb kinematics in the interpositus nucleus.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2010Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The interpositus nucleus (IN) receives a large amount of sensory information from the limbs and, in turn, elaborates signals for movement control. In this paper, we tried to gather evidence on the possibility that neurons in the IN may elaborate sensory representations of the forelimb kinematics and, particularly, of the movement velocity vector. For this purpose, the forepaw of anesthetized rats was attached to a computer-controlled robot arm displaced passively along two types of trajectories (circular and figure eight), with the limb joints unconstrained. The firing activity of single cells was recorded and related to limb position and the two components of the movement velocity vector, namely, movement speed and direction. By using multiple regression analysis, we found that 12 out of 85 (14%) neurons were modulated by position, 18 out of 85 (21%) neurons were modulated by direction, 24 out of 85 (28%) neurons were modulated by movement speed, and 31 out of 85 (37%) neurons were sensitive to the full movement velocity vector. Most of the neurons modulated only by the speed component of the velocity vector (19 out of 24) were located in the posterior portion of the IN, whereas neurons in the anterior portion were mostly related to both components of the velocity vector. These results suggest that sensory information related to whole-limb movement velocity may be encoded by the IN, indicating also that the posterior interpositus may preferentially represent movement speed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.