Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20169368›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2011

Patients' views about causes and preferences for the management of cancer-related fatigue-a case for non-congruence with the physicians?

Christophe Luthy, Christine Cedraschi, Angela Pugliesi, Katie Di Silvestro, Beatrice Mugnier-Konrad, Elisabetta Rapiti, Anne-Francoise Allaz

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Systemic oncological treatments in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: a scoping review and evidence map.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Radiotherapy-Induced Fatigue in Breast Cancer Patients.Breast care (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Relationship between skeletal muscle function, body composition, and weight loss in patients with advanced pancreatic and gastrointestinal cancers.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2019
    Article
  10. Relationship between weight loss and parameters of skeletal muscle function in patients with advanced cancer and fatigue.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2016
    Article
  11. Effect of endurance for adverse drug reactions on the preference for aggressive treatments in cancer patients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2015
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Relationship between weakness and phase angle in advanced cancer patients with fatigue.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2013
    Article
  14. Article
  15. A comparison of disrupted sleep patterns in women with cancer-related fatigue and postmenopausal women without cancer.European journal of oncology nursing : the official journal of European Oncology Nursing Society · 2011
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Christophe LuthyDepartment of Rehabilitation and Geriatrics, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva 14, Switzerland. Christophe.Luthy@hcuge.ch
Christine Cedraschi
Angela Pugliesi
Katie Di Silvestro
Beatrice Mugnier-Konrad
Elisabetta Rapiti
Anne-Francoise Allaz
Geneva College · USHôpital Beau-Séjour · CHUniversity Hospital of Geneva · CHInstitute of Social and Preventive Medicine · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCancer-related fatigue (CRF) is frequently overlooked. Adherence to treatment guidelines may be related to the patient's views about illness. This study aimed at exploring patients' views about CRF and determining whether they are congruent with best practice treatments.

methodsData were collected in 160 consecutive patients hospitalized in a supportive care setting. Biological, clinical, and psychological variables were assessed using validated questionnaires. Patients were also asked to complete the Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) and a questionnaire investigating their main symptoms and views about CRF and its management.

resultsPatients were mainly men (60%); median age was 66 years. Various cancer diagnoses were represented; 17.5% had primary local diseases, 40% local recurrences, and 42.5% metastatic diseases. The majority of the patients experienced moderate or severe CRF (76.3%) on the BFI. Fatigue was the most frequently reported symptom (87.5%). Only anxiety, depression, and dimensions of quality of life were significantly related with CRF. Two thirds of the patients associated CRF with cancer-related morbidities. As for the best treatments, patients first stressed control of adverse effects. Over half of the patients were reluctant to report fatigue, mainly because they considered fatigue as an unavoidable side effect, but also because they feared a change towards less active/aggressive treatments.

conclusionPatients mostly consider that CRF must be tolerated. Guidelines emphasize activity enhancement strategies as beneficial. The patients' preferences for rest rather than activity may be related to their high level of fatigue, which leads them to disregard activity as a possible treatment.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthQuality of LifeAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnxietyDepressionFatigueFemaleGuideline AdherenceHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPatient PreferencePractice Guidelines as Topic

Identifiers

PMID20169368
OpenAlexW2067529280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.