Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20169158›Full record

ArticlePloS one2010

Circadian plasticity in photoreceptor cells controls visual coding efficiency in Drosophila melanogaster.

Martin Barth, Michael Schultze, Christoph M Schuster, Roland Strauss

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Horizontal-cell like Dm9 neurons inFrontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Sleep, clocks, and synaptic plasticity.Trends in neurosciences · 2014
    Review
  13. Fly cryptochrome and the visual system.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Peripheral circadian rhythms and their regulatory mechanism in insects and some other arthropods: a review.Journal of comparative physiology. B, Biochemical, systemic, and environmental physiology · 2012
    Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Martin BarthFriedrich-Miescher-Laboratory of the Max-Planck Society (MPG), Tuebingen, Germany.
Michael Schultze
Christoph M Schuster
Roland Strauss
Max Planck Society · DEFriedrich Miescher Laboratory · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the fly Drosophila melanogaster, neuronal plasticity of synaptic terminals in the first optic neuropil, or lamina, depends on early visual experience within a critical period after eclosion. The current study revealed two additional and parallel mechanisms involved in this type of synaptic terminal plasticity. First, an endogenous circadian rhythm causes daily oscillations in the volume of photoreceptor cell terminals. Second, daily visual experience precisely modulates the circadian time course and amplitude of the volume oscillations that the photoreceptor-cell terminals undergo. Both mechanisms are separable in their molecular basis. We suggest that the described neuronal plasticity in Drosophila ensures continuous optimal performance of the visual system over the course of a 24 h-day. Moreover, the sensory system of Drosophila cannot only account for predictable, but also for acute, environmental changes. The volumetric changes in the synaptic terminals of photoreceptor cells are accompanied by circadian and light-induced changes of presynaptic ribbons as well as extensions of epithelial glial cells into the photoreceptor terminals, suggesting that the architecture of the lamina is altered by both visual exposure and the circadian clock. Clock-mutant analysis and the rescue of PER protein rhythmicity exclusively in all R1-6 cells revealed that photoreceptor-cell plasticity is autonomous and sufficient to control visual behavior. The strength of a visually guided behavior, the optomotor turning response, co-varies with synaptic-terminal volume oscillations of photoreceptor cells when elicited at low light levels. Our results show that behaviorally relevant adaptive processing of visual information is performed, in part, at the level of visual input level.

Indexed as

AnimalsCircadian RhythmCLOCK ProteinsDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsEyeFemaleMaleMicroscopy, ElectronModels, NeurologicalMutationNeural PathwaysNeuronal PlasticityPeriod Circadian ProteinsPhotoperiodPhotoreceptor Cells, InvertebrateClk protein, DrosophilaCLOCK ProteinsDrosophila ProteinsPeriod Circadian ProteinsPER protein, Drosophila

Identifiers

PMID20169158
PMCPMC2821403
OpenAlexW2010518744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.