Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20169037›Full record

ReviewClinical interventions in aging2010

Galantamine-ER for the treatment of mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease.

Ben Seltzer

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical interventions in aging, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Nanomedicine: A New Frontier in Alzheimer's Disease Drug Targeting.Central nervous system agents in medicinal chemistry · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Neuroprotective Effect ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ben SeltzerGeriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, V A Boston Healthcare System, Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. bseltzer@partners.org
Harvard University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An extended release form of the cholinesterase inhibitor (ChEI) drug galantamine (galantamine-ER) was developed, chiefly to increase adherence to medication regimes in patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD). Except for predicted differences in (C(max)) and t(max), comparable doses of once daily galantamine-ER and regular, immediate release galantamine, (galantamine-IR), are pharmacologically equivalent. A 24-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-and active-controlled, multicenter phase III trial, which compared galantamine-IR, galantamine-ER and placebo in subjects with mild to moderate AD (mini-mental state examination [MMSE] score range, 10 to 24) showed that both formulations of galantamine were significantly better than placebo in terms of cognition, although not with regard to global change. There was no difference in drug-related adverse events between galantamine-ER and galantamine-IR. Since its release onto the market galantamine-ER has enjoyed wide popularity and a recent surveillance study suggests that it has the highest 1-year persistence rate of all the ChEIs.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseCholinesterase InhibitorsDelayed-Action PreparationsDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble Bind InteractionGalantamineHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSeverity of Illness IndexCholinesterase InhibitorsDelayed-Action PreparationsGalantamineAlzheimer’s diseasecholinesterase inhibitorsgalantamine

Identifiers

PMID20169037
PMCPMC2817936
OpenAlexW1987028660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.