Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20168089›Full record

ArticleEpigenetics2010

Upregulation of imprinted genes in mice: an insight into the intensity of gene expression and the evolution of genomic imprinting.

Ismail Zaitoun, Karen M Downs, Guilherme J M Rosa, Hasan Khatib

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epigenetics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Methylome Dynamics of Bovine Gametes andFrontiers in genetics · 2019
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Dosage compensation of the sex chromosomes and autosomes.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2016
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ismail ZaitounDepartment of Dairy Science, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
Karen M Downs
Guilherme J M Rosa
Hasan Khatib
Russian State Agrarian Correspondence University · RUUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Morphogenesis of the chorio-allantoic placenta II: The Allantoic Core DomainR01HD042706 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DOWNS, KAREN M · 2002 to 2012
$3.0M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD042706
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Imprinted genes are expressed monoallelically because one of the two copies is silenced epigentically in a parent-of-origin pattern. This pattern of expression is controlled by differential marking of parental alleles by DNA methylation and chromatin modifications, including both suppressive and permissive histone acetylation and methylation. Suppressive histone modifications mark silenced alleles of imprinted genes, while permissive histone modifications mark the active alleles, suggesting the possibility that imprinted genes would show upregulation in gene expression. However, it is currently unknown whether imprinted genes show such upregulation. To address this question in mice, we estimated the intensity of expression of 59 genes relative to the rest of the genome by analyzing microarray data. Expression levels of 24 genes were validated using quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR). Expression of imprinted genes was found to be upreguled in various adult and embryonic mouse tissues. Consistent with their functions in growth and development, imprinted genes were found to be highly expressed in extraembryonic tissues and progressively upregulated during early embryonic development. In conclusion, upregulation of imprinted genes found in this study is similar to the dosage compensation (twofold upregulation) recently reported for X-linked genes. It has been proposed that the twofold upregulation of X-linked genes has been coupled with low transcriptional variation (noise) which could lead to deleterious effects on the organism. Results of this study suggest a general need for imprinted genes in the mouse to be upregulated to certain levels in order to avoid deleterious effects of variation in gene expression.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalAnimalsEmbryo, MammalianGene Expression ProfilingGenomic ImprintingMiceOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionUp-Regulation

Identifiers

PMID20168089
PMCPMC3020655
OpenAlexW2077345769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.