Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20167947›Full record

ArticleMolecular & cellular proteomics : MCP2010

Cyclic AMP- and (Rp)-cAMPS-induced conformational changes in a complex of the catalytic and regulatory (RI{alpha}) subunits of cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase.

Ganesh S Anand, Srinath Krishnamurthy, Tanushree Bishnoi, Alexandr Kornev, Susan S Taylor, David A Johnson

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Allosteric linkers in cAMP signalling.Biochemical Society transactions · 2014
    Review
  11. Signaling through dynamic linkers as revealed by PKA.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ganesh S AnandDepartment of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Srinath Krishnamurthy
Tanushree Bishnoi
Alexandr Kornev
Susan S Taylor
David A Johnson
National University of Singapore · SGUniversity of California, San Diego · USUniversity of California, Riverside · US

Funding

Protein Kinase Regulatory Subunit I Directed MutagenesisR01GM034921 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI TAYLOR, SUSAN S. · 1985 to 2018
$7.2M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIGMS NIH HHS GM34921NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM034921
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We took a discovery approach to explore the actions of cAMP and two of its analogs, one a cAMP mimic ((S(p))-adenosine cyclic 3':5'-monophosphorothioate ((S(p))-cAMPS)) and the other a diastereoisomeric antagonist ((R(p))-cAMPS), on a model system of the type Iα cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase holoenzyme, RIα(91-244)·C-subunit, by using fluorescence spectroscopy and amide H/(2)H exchange mass spectrometry. Specifically, for the fluorescence experiments, fluorescein maleimide was conjugated to three cysteine single residue substitution mutants, R92C, T104C, and R239C, of RIα(91-244), and the effects of cAMP, (S(p))-cAMPS, and (R(p))-cAMPS on the kinetics of R-C binding and the time-resolved anisotropy of the reporter group at each conjugation site were measured. For the amide exchange experiments, ESI-TOF mass spectrometry with pepsin proteolytic fragmentation was used to assess the effects of (R(p))-cAMPS on amide exchange of the RIα(91-244)·C-subunit complex. We found that cAMP and its mimic perturbed at least parts of the C-subunit interaction Sites 2 and 3 but probably not Site 1 via reduced interactions of the linker region and αC of RIα(91-244). Surprisingly, (R(p))-cAMPS not only increased the affinity of RIα(91-244) toward the C-subunit by 5-fold but also produced long range effects that propagated through both the C- and R-subunits to produce limited unfolding and/or enhanced conformational flexibility. This combination of effects is consistent with (R(p))-cAMPS acting by enhancing the internal entropy of the R·C complex. Finally, the (R(p))-cAMPS-induced increase in affinity of RIα(91-244) toward the C-subunit indicates that (R(p))-cAMPS is better described as an inverse agonist because it decreases the fractional dissociation of the cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase holoenzyme and in turn its basal activity.

Indexed as

Cyclic AMPCyclic AMP-Dependent Protein KinasesFluoresceinFluorescence PolarizationKineticsModels, MolecularProtein ConformationSpectrometry, Mass, Electrospray IonizationCyclic AMPCyclic AMP-Dependent Protein KinasesFluorescein

Identifiers

PMID20167947
PMCPMC2957725
OpenAlexW2063974082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.