Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20167900›Full record

Trial reportAmerican journal of public health2010

A randomized trial of tailored skin cancer prevention messages for adults: Project SCAPE.

Karen Glanz, Elinor R Schoenfeld, Alana Steffen

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in American journal of public health, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Sun protection for preventing basal cell and squamous cell skin cancers.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Increasing Skin Cancer Prevention in Young Adults: the Cumulative Impact of Personalized UV Photography and MC1R Genetic Testing.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2023
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Impact of personal genomic risk information on melanoma prevention behaviors and psychological outcomes: a randomized controlled trial.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2021
    Trial
  8. Effects of tailored risk communications for skin cancer prevention and detection: the PennSCAPE randomized trial.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2015
    Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Randomized controlled trial of a sun protection intervention for children of melanoma survivors.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2013
    Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Melanoma genetic testing, counseling, and adherence to skin cancer prevention and detection behaviors.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2013
    Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Karen GlanzDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6021, USA. kglanz@upenn.edu
Elinor R Schoenfeld
Alana Steffen

Funding

EVALUATION OF TAILORED SKIN CANCER PREVENTION STRATEGIESR01CA076419 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT MANOA · PI GLANZ, KAREN · 1998 to 2001
$696k
NCI NIH HHS CA 76419NCI NIH HHS R01 CA076419
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe evaluated the impact of a mailed, tailored intervention on skin cancer prevention and skin self-examination behaviors of adults at moderate and high risk for skin cancer.

methodsAdults at moderate and high risk for skin cancer were recruited in primary health care settings in Honolulu, HI, and Long Island, NY. After completing a baseline survey, participants were randomized to 2 groups. The treatment group received tailored materials, including personalized risk feedback, and the control group received general educational materials. Multivariate analyses compared sun protection and skin self-examination between groups, controlling for location, risk level, gender, and age.

resultsA total of 596 adults completed the trial. The tailored materials had a significant effect on overall sun-protection habits, the use of hats, the use of sunglasses, and the recency of skin self-examination. Some effects were moderated by location and risk level.

conclusionsTailored communications including personalized risk feedback can improve sun-protection behaviors and skin self-examination among adults at increased risk for skin cancer. These convenient, low-cost interventions can be implemented in a variety of settings and should be tested further to assess their long-term effectiveness.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAge FactorsHawaiiHealth BehaviorHealth SurveysHumansMiddle AgedNew YorkOutcome Assessment, Health CarePatient Education as TopicRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSelf-ExaminationSex FactorsSkin NeoplasmsSunscreening Agents

Identifiers

PMID20167900
PMCPMC2836338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.