Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20167861›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of pathology2010

Establishment and genomic characterization of mouse xenografts of human primary prostate tumors.

Carmen Priolo, Michelle Agostini, Natalie Vena, Azra H Ligon, Michelangelo Fiorentino, Eyoung Shin, Antonella Farsetti, Alfredo Pontecorvi, Ewa Sicinska, Massimo Loda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of pathology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Patient-derived human tumour tissue xenografts in immunodeficient mice: a systematic review.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2010
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Tumor evolution: Linear, branching, neutral or punctuated?Biochimica et biophysica acta. Reviews on cancer · 2017
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Preclinical humanized mouse model with ectopic ovarian tissues.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2014
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Carmen PrioloDana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Michelle Agostini
Natalie Vena
Azra H Ligon
Michelangelo Fiorentino
Eyoung Shin
Antonella Farsetti
Alfredo Pontecorvi
Ewa Sicinska
Massimo Loda

Funding

Tumor and Circulating Markers as Links Between Obesity and Lethal Prostate CanceP50CA090381 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE · PI GARRAWAY, LEVI A. · 2002 to 2017
$36.2M
Transgenic Mouse CoreP01CA089021 · NCI · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI CANTLEY, LEWIS C. · 2001 to 2011
$20.1M
Molecular Link Between Metabolic Syndrome and Prostate CancerR01CA131945 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI LODA, MASSIMO · 2008 to 2018
$4.0M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA089021NCI NIH HHS P01CA89021NCI NIH HHS P50 CA090381NCI NIH HHS P50CA90381NCI NIH HHS R01 CA131945NCI NIH HHS R01CA131945
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Serum prostate-specific antigen screening has led to earlier detection and surgical treatment of prostate cancer, favoring an increasing incidence-to-mortality ratio. However, about one third of tumors that are diagnosed when still confined to the prostate can relapse within 10 years from the first treatment. The challenge is therefore to identify prognostic markers of aggressive versus indolent tumors. Although several preclinical models of advanced prostate tumors are available, a model that recapitulates the genetic and growth behavior of primary tumors is still lacking. Here, we report a complete histopathological and genomic characterization of xenografts derived from primary localized low- and high-grade human prostate tumors that were implanted under the renal capsule of immunodeficient mice. We obtained a tumor take of 56% and show that these xenografts maintained the histological as well as most genomic features of the parental tumors. Serum prostate-specific antigen levels were measurable only in tumor xenograft-bearing mice, but not in those implanted with either normal prostate tissue or in tumors that likely regressed. Finally, we show that a high proliferation rate, but not the pathological stage or the Gleason grade of the original tumor, was a fundamental prerequisite for tumor take in mice. This mouse xenograft model represents a useful preclinical model of primary prostate tumors for their biological characterization, biomarker discovery, and drug testing.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticAnimalsBiomarkersBiomarkers, TumorHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceMaleMiceMice, Inbred NODMice, NudeMice, SCIDNeoplasm TransplantationProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsBiomarkersBiomarkers, TumorProstate-Specific Antigen

Identifiers

PMID20167861
PMCPMC2843479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.