Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20167134›Full record

ArticleRetrovirology2010

Dominance of highly divergent feline leukemia virus A progeny variants in a cat with recurrent viremia and fatal lymphoma.

A Katrin Helfer-Hungerbuehler, Valentino Cattori, Felicitas S Boretti, Pete Ossent, Paula Grest, Manfred Reinacher, Manfred Henrich, Eva Bauer, Kim Bauer-Pham, Eva Niederer and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Retrovirology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. 2020 AAFP Feline Retrovirus Testing and Management Guidelines.Journal of feline medicine and surgery · 2020
    Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Feline leukaemia virus infection: A practical approach to diagnosis.Journal of feline medicine and surgery · 2020
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

A Katrin Helfer-HungerbuehlerClinical Laboratory, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. khungerbuehler@vetclinics.uzh.ch
Valentino Cattori
Felicitas S Boretti
Pete Ossent
Paula Grest
Manfred Reinacher
Manfred Henrich
Eva Bauer
Kim Bauer-Pham
Eva Niederer
Edgar Holznagel
Hans Lutz
Regina Hofmann-Lehmann
University of Zurich · CHUniversity of Giessen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn a cat that had ostensibly recovered from feline leukemia virus (FeLV) infection, we observed the reappearance of the virus and the development of fatal lymphoma 8.5 years after the initial experimental exposure to FeLV-A/Glasgow-1. The goals of the present study were to investigate this FeLV reoccurrence and molecularly characterize the progeny viruses.

resultsThe FeLV reoccurrence was detected by the presence of FeLV antigen and RNA in the blood and saliva. The cat was feline immunodeficiency virus positive and showed CD4+ T-cell depletion, severe leukopenia, anemia and a multicentric monoclonal B-cell lymphoma. FeLV-A, but not -B or -C, was detectable. Sequencing of the envelope gene revealed three FeLV variants that were highly divergent from the virus that was originally inoculated (89-91% identity to FeLV-A/Glasgow-1). In the long terminal repeat 31 point mutations, some previously described in cats with lymphomas, were detected. The FeLV variant tissue provirus and viral RNA loads were significantly higher than the FeLV-A/Glasgow-1 loads. Moreover, the variant loads were significantly higher in lymphoma positive compared to lymphoma negative tissues. An increase in the variant provirus blood load was observed at the time of FeLV reoccurrence.

conclusionsOur results demonstrate that ostensibly recovered FeLV provirus-positive cats may act as a source of infection following FeLV reactivation. The virus variants that had largely replaced the inoculation strain had unusually heavily mutated envelopes. The mutations may have led to increased viral fitness and/or changed the mutagenic characteristics of the virus.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, GeneticVirus ActivationAnimalsAntigens, ViralBloodCatsCD4 Lymphocyte CountCluster AnalysisFemaleImmunodeficiency Virus, FelineLeukemia Virus, FelineLymphoma, B-CellPhylogenyPoint MutationRecurrenceRNA, ViralAntigens, ViralRNA, ViralViral Envelope Proteins

Identifiers

PMID20167134
PMCPMC2837606
OpenAlexW2098801371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.