Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20167132›Full record

ArticleVirology journal2010

Avian influenza virus monitoring in wintering waterbirds in Iran, 2003-2007.

Sasan R Fereidouni, Ortrud Werner, Elke Starick, Martin Beer, Timm C Harder, Mehdi Aghakhan, Hossein Modirrousta, Hamid Amini, Majid Kharrazian Moghaddam, Mohammad H Bozorghmehrifard and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Virology journal, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Sasan R FereidouniFriedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Insel Riems, Germany. sasan.fereidouni@fli.bund.de
Ortrud Werner
Elke Starick
Martin Beer
Timm C Harder
Mehdi Aghakhan
Hossein Modirrousta
Hamid Amini
Majid Kharrazian Moghaddam
Mohammad H Bozorghmehrifard
Mohammad A Akhavizadegan
Nicolas Gaidet
Scott H Newman
Saliha Hammoumi
Giovanni Cattoli
Anja Globig
Bernd Hoffmann
Mohammad E Sehati
Siamak Masoodi
Tim Dodman
Ward Hagemeijer
Shirin Mousakhani
Thomas C Mettenleiter

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVirological, molecular and serological studies were carried out to determine the status of infections with avian influenza viruses (AIV) in different species of wild waterbirds in Iran during 2003-2007. Samples were collected from 1146 birds representing 45 different species with the majority of samples originating from ducks, coots and shorebirds. Samples originated from 6 different provinces representative for the 15 most important wintering sites of migratory waterbirds in Iran.

resultsOverall, AIV were detected in approximately 3.4% of the samples. However, prevalence was higher (up to 8.3%) at selected locations and for certain species. No highly pathogenic avian influenza, including H5N1 was detected. A total of 35 AIVs were detected from cloacal or oropharyngeal swab samples. These positive samples originated mainly from Mallards and Common Teals.Of 711 serum samples tested for AIV antibodies, 345 (48.5%) were positive by using a nucleoprotein-specific competitive ELISA (NP-C-ELISA). Ducks including Mallard, Common Teal, Common Pochard, Northern Shoveler and Eurasian Wigeon revealed the highest antibody prevalence ranging from 44 to 75%.

conclusionResults of these investigations provide important information about the prevalence of LPAIV in wild birds in Iran, especially wetlands around the Caspian Sea which represent an important wintering site for migratory water birds. Mallard and Common Teal exhibited the highest number of positives in virological and serological investigations: 43% and 26% virological positive cases and 24% and 46% serological positive reactions, respectively. These two species may play an important role in the ecology and perpetuation of influenza viruses in this region. In addition, it could be shown that both oropharyngeal and cloacal swab samples contribute to the detection of positive birds, and neither should be neglected.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, ViralBirdsCloacaGenotypeInfluenza A virusInfluenza in BirdsIranOropharynxPhylogenyPrevalenceRNA, ViralSequence Analysis, DNAAntibodies, ViralRNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID20167132
PMCPMC2837633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.