Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20167060›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2010

The epidemiology of medical emergency contacts outside hospitals in Norway--a prospective population based study.

Erik Zakariassen, Robert Anders Burman, Steinar Hunskaar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A comparison of two emergency medical dispatch protocols with respect to accuracy.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2017
    Trial
  2. Medical evacuations by search and rescue helicopters in the Barents Sea.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Termination of prehospital resuscitative efforts: a study of documentation on ethical considerations at the scene.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2017
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Medical priority dispatch codes-comparison with National Early Warning Score.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2016
    Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Erik ZakariassenNational Centre for Emergency Primary Health Care, Uni Health, Bergen, Norway, Kalfarveien 31, 5018 Bergen, Norway. erik.zakariassen@isf.uib.no
Robert Anders Burman
Steinar Hunskaar
Uni Research (Norway) · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThere is a lack of epidemiological knowledge on medical emergencies outside hospitals in Norway. The aim of the present study was to obtain representative data on the epidemiology of medical emergencies classified as "red responses" in Norway.

methodThree emergency medical dispatch centres (EMCCs) were chosen as catchment areas, covering 816 000 inhabitants. During a three month period in 2007 the EMCCs gathered information on every situation that was triaged as a red response, according to The Norwegian Index of Medical Emergencies (Index). Records from ground ambulances, air ambulances, and the primary care doctors were subsequently collected. International Classification of Primary Care-2 symptom codes (ICPC-2) and The National Committee on Aeronautics (NACA) Score System were given retrospectively.

resultsTotal incidence of red response situations was 5 105 during the three month period. 394 patients were involved in 138 accidents, and 181 situations were without patients, resulting in a total of 5 180 patients. The patients' age ranged from 0 to 107 years, with a median age of 57, and 55% were male. 90% of the red responses were medical problems with a large variation of symptoms, the remainder being accidents. 70% of the patients were in a non-life-threatening situation. Within the accident group, males accounted for 61%, and 35% were aged between 10 and 29 years, with a median age of 37 years. Few of the 39 chapters in the Index were used, A10 "Chest pain" was the most common one (22% of all situations). ICPC-2 symptom codes showed that cardiovascular, syncope/coma, respiratory and neurological problems were most common. 50% of all patients in a sever situation (NACA score 4-7) were > 70 years of age.

conclusionsThe results show that emergency medicine based on 816 000 Norwegians mainly consists of medical problems, where the majority of the patients have a non-life-threatening situation. More focus on the emergency system outside hospitals, including triage and dispatch, and how to best deal with "everyday" emergency problems is needed to secure knowledge based decisions for the future organization of the emergency system.

Indexed as

AccidentsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildChild, PreschoolCritical IllnessEmergenciesEmergency Medical ServicesFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID20167060
PMCPMC2836273
OpenAlexW2131197245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.