ArticleJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2010
Health care services provided during physician office visits for hypertension: differences by specialty.
Article in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Do doctors know that it takes more than an apple a day? Impact of formal nutrition training on family medicine residents' nutrition knowledge, confidence, attitudes, and counselling abilities: a single site study.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Article
- Hypertension-associated hospitalizations and costs in the United States, 1979-2006.Blood pressure · 2014Article
- How well do we care for patients with hypertension?Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2012Review
- The Provision of Health Care by Family Physicians in Taiwan as Illustrated With Population Pyramids.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The changing health care system has reduced patients' access to specialty care. Often, patients with hypertension visit noncardiologists. The objective of this study is to compare differences by physician specialty in the provision of health care services during office visits for hypertension. The authors examined office visits for US physicians by using data from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey for 2003 to 2005. Of more than 274 million hypertension visits, 35.5%, 43.9%, 8.5%, and 12.1% visits were made to general practitioners/family physicians, internists, cardiologists, and other specialties, respectively. Visitors to cardiologists were more likely to have coronary heart disease and heart failure than visitors to other physicians. While prescriptions for antihypertensive drugs overall were similar by specialty, cardiologists were more likely to prescribe lipid-lowering drugs (odds ratio [OR], 1.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.14-2.24) and aspirin (OR, 2.76; 95% CI, 1.81-4.20), calcium channel blockers (OR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.12-1.96), beta-blockers (OR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.35-2.48), and alpha-blockers (OR, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.46-2.95) than general practitioners/family physicians after adjusting for relevant risk factors. There was no difference by specialty in providing/making a referral for nutrition/exercise counseling among physicians. Among hypertension office visits in the United States, cardiologists were more likely to provide lipid-lowering drugs, aspirin, calcium channel blocker, beta-blockers, and alpha-blockers than other physicians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.