Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20166089›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2010

Heliox for croup in children.

Christiane Vorwerk, Tim Coats

RetractedAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Heliox for croup in children.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Heliox for croup in children.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. Nebulized epinephrine for croup in children.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Upper Airway Obstruction in Children.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2015
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Croup in children.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2013
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Common pediatric respiratory emergencies.Emergency medicine clinics of North America · 2012
    Review
  10. [Respiratory emergencies in childhood and adolescence].Monatsschrift Kinderheilkunde : Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Kinderheilkunde · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christiane VorwerkDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Infirmary Square, Leicester, UK, LE1 5WW.
Tim Coats
Leicester Royal Infirmary · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCroup, a common acute clinical syndrome in children up to the age of six, is thought to be triggered by a viral infection, and is characterised by a varying degree of respiratory distress due to upper airway inflammation and oedema of the subglottic mucosa. Corticosteroids, now part of the standard treatment for croup, improve symptoms but it takes time for their full effect to be achieved. Meanwhile, the child remains at risk of deterioration and developing respiratory failure necessitating emergency intubation and ventilation. Helium-oxygen (heliox) inhalation has been successful in the treatment of upper airway obstruction. Anecdotal evidence suggests that heliox relieves respiratory distress in children, but it remains unclear whether there is robust evidence to support the implementation of heliox for croup into clinical practice.

objectivesTo examine the effect of heliox on relieving symptoms and distress, determined by a croup score (a tool for measuring the severity of croup) or clinical assessment variables, through comparisons with placebo or active treatment(s) in children with croup. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2009, issue 2) which contains the Acute Respiratory Infections (ARI) Group's Specialised Register; MEDLINE (1950 to June week 3 2009); EMBASE (1974 to 2009 week 25) and CINAHL (1982 to June 2009). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs comparing the effect of helium-oxygen mixtures with placebo or any active treatment in children with croup. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Both authors independently identified and assessed citations for relevance. We assessed included trials for risk of bias using allocation concealment, blinding of intervention, completeness of outcome data, selective outcome reporting and other potential source of bias. We calculated mean differences for continuous data. We presented data not suitable for statistical analysis as descriptive data. MAIN

resultsTwo eligible RCTs were included (22 intervention, 22 controls). Neither trial compared heliox inhalation with placebo. One study compared heliox with 30% humidified oxygen whilst the other compared it to 100% oxygen with additional racaemic epinephrine nebulisation. There was no significant difference in change of croup score between intervention and control groups. AUTHORS'

conclusionsAt present there is a lack of evidence to establish the effect of heliox inhalation in the treatment of croup in children. A methodologically well-designed and adequately powered RCT is needed to assess whether there is a role for heliox therapy in the management of children with croup.

Indexed as

Airway ObstructionAirway ResistanceChild, PreschoolCroupHeliumHumansInfantOxygenOxygen Inhalation TherapyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopichelioxHeliumOxygen

Identifiers

PMID20166089
OpenAlexW1837222802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.