Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20166085›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2010

Neuroprotection for treatment of glaucoma in adults.

Dayse F Sena, Kanchan Ramchand, Kristina Lindsley

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Neuroprotection for treatment of glaucoma in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  2. Neuroprotection for treatment of glaucoma in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  3. Interventions for age-related visual problems in patients with stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Protective effects ofMolecular vision · 2018
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Current perspective of neuroprotection and glaucoma.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2015
    Review
  11. Glaucomatous optic neuropathy management: the role of neuroprotective agents.Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal · 2013
    Review
  12. A ketogenic diet may offer neuroprotection in glaucoma and mitochondrial diseases of the optic nerve.Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal · 2012
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Clinical evidence for neuroprotection in glaucoma.American journal of ophthalmology · 2011
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dayse F SenaMassachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, 243 Charles St, Connecting Building 703, Boston, Massachusetts, USA, 02114.
Kanchan Ramchand
Kristina Lindsley
Johns Hopkins University · USMassachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary · US

Funding

Comparative Effectiveness Research & the Cochrane Eyes & Vision GroupU01EY020522 · NEI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI DICKERSIN, KAY · 2010 to 2016
$9.2M
COCHRANE EYE AND VISION GROUP-COORDINATING RESOURCE CENTER-260021003N01EY021003 · NEI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI DICKERSIN, KAY · 2006 to 2006
–
NEI NIH HHS N01 EY021003NEI NIH HHS U01 EY020522
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlaucoma is a heterogeneous group of conditions involving progressive damage to the optic nerve, deterioration of retinal ganglion cells and ultimately visual field loss. It is a leading cause of blindness worldwide. Open angle glaucoma (OAG), the commonest form of glaucoma, is a chronic condition that may or may not present with increased intraocular pressure (IOP). Neuroprotection for glaucoma refers to any intervention intended to prevent optic nerve damage or cell death. The treatment can target extracellular factors such as reducing IOP, or cellular factors derived from the optic nerve itself such as blocking intracellular death signals.

objectivesThe objective of this review was to systematically examine the evidence regarding the effectiveness of neuroprotective agents, either topical or oral, for slowing the progression of OAG in adults. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Group Trials Register) (The Cochrane Library, Issue 4, 2009), MEDLINE (January 1960 to January 2010), EMBASE (January 1980 to January 2010), Latin American and Caribbean Literature on Health Sciences (LILACS) (January 1982 to January 2010) and ClinicalTrials.gov (http://clinicaltrials.gov). (5 January 2010). There were no language or date restrictions in the search for trials. The electronic databases were last searched on 5 January 2010. SELECTION CRITERIA: This review was limited to randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in which topical or oral treatments were used to prevent retinal ganglion cell death. Our population of interest was adults with OAG. As the primary outcome for this review was the proportion of participants who developed any progression of visual field loss at five years post intervention, only trials with at least five years of follow-up were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently reviewed titles and abstracts from the literature searches. Full text copies of relevant or potentially relevant studies were obtained and re-evaluated for inclusion. There were no trials identified for this review, thus we performed no data extraction or meta-analysis. Two studies comparing memantine to placebo are currently awaiting classification until additional study details are provided. Reasons for excluding studies from the review were documented. MAIN

resultsIn accordance with the selection criteria for inclusion, we identified no studies relevant for this review. The results of short-term trials and other studies are discussed in this review. AUTHORS'

conclusionsAlthough neuroprotective agents are intended to act as pharmacological antagonists to prevent cell death, the evidence that they are effective in preventing retinal ganglion cell death, and thus preserving vision in patients with OAG, has not been demonstrated. Long-term RCTs are needed to determine whether or not neuroprotective agents may be beneficial for individuals with OAG.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAdministration, TopicalAdultCell DeathDisease ProgressionGlaucoma, Open-AngleHumansNeuroprotective AgentsOptic NerveOptic Nerve DiseasesRetinal Ganglion CellsNeuroprotective Agents

Identifiers

PMID20166085
PMCPMC3478138
OpenAlexW4236201648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.