Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20166060›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2010

Mucolytic agents for chronic bronchitis or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Phillippa Poole, Peter N Black

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Concordance of effects of medical interventions on hospital admission and readmission rates with effects on mortality.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2013
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Chronic bronchitis and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2013
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Lancet (London, England) · 2012
    Review
  9. Mucoactive therapy in COPD.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2010
    Review
  10. Impact of exacerbations on COPD.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2010
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Phillippa PooleUniversity of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand.
Peter N Black
University of Auckland · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIndividuals with chronic bronchitis or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) may suffer recurrent exacerbations with an increase in volume and/or purulence of sputum. Because of the personal and healthcare costs associated with exacerbations, any therapy that reduces the number of exacerbations is useful. There is a marked difference between countries in terms of prescribing of mucolytics depending on whether or not they are perceived to be effective.

objectivesTo assess the effects of oral mucolytics in adults with stable chronic bronchitis or COPD. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Airways Group Specialised Register and reference lists of articles on eight separate occasions, the most recent being in September 2008. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials that compared oral mucolytic therapy with placebo for at least two months in adults with chronic bronchitis or COPD. We excluded studies of people with asthma and cystic fibrosis. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: One review author extracted data. We contacted study authors and drug companies for missing information. MAIN

resultsTwenty-eight trials involving 7042 participants were included. Compared with placebo, there was a significant reduction in the number of exacerbations per patient with oral mucolytics (weighted mean difference (WMD) -0.04 per month, 95% confidence interval -0.05 to -0.03). Using a weighted annualised rate of exacerbations in the control patients of 2.4 per year, this is a 21% reduction. The number of days of disability also fell (WMD -0.56, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.77 to -0.35). One recent study has shown that the benefit may apply only to patients not already receiving inhaled corticosteroids. The number of patients who remained exacerbation-free was greater in the mucolytic group (odds ratio (OR) 1.93 (95% CI 1.71 to 2.17)). There is no strong evidence of improvement in lung function and treatment is not associated with any increase in adverse effects. Patients on mucolytics may be less likely to be hospitalised during the study period. AUTHORS'

conclusionsIn participants with chronic bronchitis or COPD, treatment with mucolytics was associated with a small reduction in acute exacerbations and a reduction in total number of days of disability. Benefit may be greater in individuals who have frequent or prolonged exacerbations, or those who are repeatedly admitted to hospital with exacerbations with COPD. Mucolytics should be considered for use, through the winter months at least, in patients with moderate or severe COPD in whom inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are not prescribed.

Indexed as

AdultBronchitisChronic DiseaseExpectorantsHumansPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicExpectorants

Identifiers

PMID20166060
OpenAlexW4241568765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.