SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2010
Mucolytic agents for chronic bronchitis or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Benefits of interventions for respiratory secretion management in adult palliative care patients-a systematic review.BMC palliative care · 2016Pooled it
- Concordance of effects of medical interventions on hospital admission and readmission rates with effects on mortality.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2013Pooled it
- Article
- The Relationship of Mucus Concentration (Hydration) to Mucus Osmotic Pressure and Transport in Chronic Bronchitis.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2015Article
- The pharmacological approach to the elderly COPD patient.Drugs & aging · 2013Review
- Chronic bronchitis and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2013Review
- Sensitivity and predictive value of 15 PubMed search strategies to answer clinical questions rated against full systematic reviews.Journal of medical Internet research · 2012Review
- Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Lancet (London, England) · 2012Review
- Mucoactive therapy in COPD.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2010Review
- Impact of exacerbations on COPD.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2010Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by[Not Available].2010
- Updated by
- Update of
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIndividuals with chronic bronchitis or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) may suffer recurrent exacerbations with an increase in volume and/or purulence of sputum. Because of the personal and healthcare costs associated with exacerbations, any therapy that reduces the number of exacerbations is useful. There is a marked difference between countries in terms of prescribing of mucolytics depending on whether or not they are perceived to be effective.
objectivesTo assess the effects of oral mucolytics in adults with stable chronic bronchitis or COPD. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Airways Group Specialised Register and reference lists of articles on eight separate occasions, the most recent being in September 2008. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials that compared oral mucolytic therapy with placebo for at least two months in adults with chronic bronchitis or COPD. We excluded studies of people with asthma and cystic fibrosis. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: One review author extracted data. We contacted study authors and drug companies for missing information. MAIN
resultsTwenty-eight trials involving 7042 participants were included. Compared with placebo, there was a significant reduction in the number of exacerbations per patient with oral mucolytics (weighted mean difference (WMD) -0.04 per month, 95% confidence interval -0.05 to -0.03). Using a weighted annualised rate of exacerbations in the control patients of 2.4 per year, this is a 21% reduction. The number of days of disability also fell (WMD -0.56, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.77 to -0.35). One recent study has shown that the benefit may apply only to patients not already receiving inhaled corticosteroids. The number of patients who remained exacerbation-free was greater in the mucolytic group (odds ratio (OR) 1.93 (95% CI 1.71 to 2.17)). There is no strong evidence of improvement in lung function and treatment is not associated with any increase in adverse effects. Patients on mucolytics may be less likely to be hospitalised during the study period. AUTHORS'
conclusionsIn participants with chronic bronchitis or COPD, treatment with mucolytics was associated with a small reduction in acute exacerbations and a reduction in total number of days of disability. Benefit may be greater in individuals who have frequent or prolonged exacerbations, or those who are repeatedly admitted to hospital with exacerbations with COPD. Mucolytics should be considered for use, through the winter months at least, in patients with moderate or severe COPD in whom inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are not prescribed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.