Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20165972›Full record

ArticleJournal of occupational rehabilitation2010

Determinants of return to work after occupational injury.

Yonghua He, Jia Hu, Ignatius Tak Sun Yu, Wei Gu, Youxin Liang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Socio-economic disparities and returning to work following an injury.Israel journal of health policy research · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Long-Term Effects of Psychological Symptoms after Occupational Injury on Return to Work: A 6-Year Follow-Up.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yonghua HeSchool of Public Health/Fudan-Liberty Mutual SafeWork Center/WHO Collaborating Center for Occupational Health, Fudan University, P.O. Box 288, No. 130, Dong'an Road, 200032, Shanghai, People's Republic of China. hyhup@shmu.edu.cn
Jia Hu
Ignatius Tak Sun Yu
Wei Gu
Youxin Liang

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe promotion of return to work (RTW) following occupational injury benefits injured workers, their families, enterprises and the society. The identification of the potential determinants would be helpful in improving RTW rate and minimizing the duration of absenteeism following injury.

objectivesThe aim of the study was to identify the potential determinants of RTW following work-related injury.

methodsA historical cohort of workers with occupational injury in a state-owned locomotive vehicles company in central China was followed up on the outcomes of RTW. Demographic, employment and medical information was retrieved from the company archival documents; and post-injury information was interviewed by structured questionnaires. Univariate analysis and Cox Regression Model were used to examine the associations between potential determinants and outcomes of RTW.

resultsThree hundred of the 323 cases (92.9%) eventually returned to work after the median absence of 43 days. Factors from socio-demographic, clinical, economic, and psychological domains affected RTW in the univariate analyses. The multivariate analysis indicated that age, injury severity, injury locus, injury nature, pain in the injury locus, self-report health status and pre-injury monthly salary were significant determinants of RTW.

conclusionsThere were multidimensional factors affecting RTW after occupational injury. Proper clinical treatment and rehabilitation, as well as economic and social support to facilitate workers' RTW would be the priorities upon intervention. Future studies should be conducted in larger representative samples to confirm the findings and to develop a multidisciplinary intervention strategy towards promoting RTW.

Indexed as

AbsenteeismAccidents, OccupationalAdultChinaCohort StudiesDisability EvaluationEmploymentFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedProportional Hazards ModelsRecovery of FunctionSick Leave

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.