ReviewSexual plant reproduction2010
The evolution of self-fertility in apomictic plants.
Review in Sexual plant reproduction, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
46 citing papers in PubMed, 125 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Shedding light on autonomous endosperm development.Protoplasma · 2026Article
- The evolutionary dynamics of plant mating systems: how bias for studying 'interesting' plant reproductive systems could backfire.Annals of botany · 2025Review
- A revision of the genusFrontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Reproductive Performance of the Alpine Plant SpeciesLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Apomixis and the paradox of sex in plants.Annals of botany · 2024Review
- New Frontiers in Potato Breeding: Tinkering with Reproductive Genes and Apomixis.Biomolecules · 2024Review
- Island plants with newly discovered reproductive traits have higher capacity for uniparental reproduction, supporting Baker's law.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Comparative analysis of molecular and morphological diversity in two diploid Paspalum species (Poaceae) with contrasting mating systems.Plant reproduction · 2024Article
- Interploidy gene flow via a 'pentaploid bridge' and ploidy reduction in Cystopteris fragilis fern complex (Cystopteridaceae: Polypodiales).Plant reproduction · 2023Article
- Genomic conservation of crop wild relatives: A case study of citrus.PLoS genetics · 2023Article
- Alternative Evolutionary Pathways inGenes · 2023Article
- Geometric Morphometric Versus Genomic Patterns in a Large Polyploid Plant Species Complex.Biology · 2023Article
- Apomictic Mountain Whitebeam (Biology · 2023Article
- Geographical Parthenogenesis in Alpine and Arctic Plants.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- The Effectiveness of the Sexual Reproduction in Selected Clonal and Nonclonal Species of the GenusBiology · 2022Article
- Genome Size, Cytotype Diversity and Reproductive Mode Variation ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- In search of female sterility causes in the tetraploid and pentaploid cytotype of Pilosella brzovecensis (Asteraceae).Journal of plant research · 2021Article
- Autonomous apomixis inAoB PLANTS · 2021Article
- Breeding system of diploid sexuals within theEcology and evolution · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Self-fertilization and apomixis have often been seen as alternative evolutionary strategies of flowering plants that are advantageous for colonization scenarios and in bottleneck situations. Both traits have multiple origins, but different genetic control mechanisms; possible connections between the two phenomena have long been overlooked. Most apomictic plants, however, need a fertilization of polar nuclei for normal seed development (pseudogamy). If self-pollen is used for this purpose, self-compatibility is a requirement for successful pollen tube growth. Apomictic lineages usually evolve from sexual self-incompatible outcrossing plants, but pseudogamous apomicts frequently show a breakdown of self-incompatibility. Two possible pathways may explain the evolution of SC: (1) Polyploidy not only may trigger gametophytic apomixis, but also may result in a partial breakdown of SI systems. (2) Alternatively, frequent pseudo self-compatibility (PSC) via aborted pollen may induce selfing of pseudogamous apomicts (mentor effects). Self-fertile pseudogamous genotypes will be selected for within mixed sexual-apomictic populations because of avoidance of interploidal crosses; in founder situations, SC provides reproductive assurance independent from pollinators and mating partners. SI pseudogamous genotypes will be selected against in mixed populations because of minority cytotype problems and high pollen discounting; in founder populations, SI reactions among clone mates will reduce seed set. Selection for SC genotypes will eliminate SI unless the apomict maintains a high genotypic diversity and thus a diversity of S-alleles within a population, or shifts to pollen-independent autonomous apomixis. The implications of a breakdown of SI in apomictic plants for evolutionary questions and for agricultural sciences are being discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.