ArticleJournal of human hypertension2010
Self blood pressure monitoring: a worthy substitute for ambulatory blood pressure?
Article in Journal of human hypertension, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Wrist-type home blood pressure monitoring device improves usability and preserves sleep quality compared with conventional ambulatory monitoring.Journal of hypertension · 2026Trial
- Review
- National Registry of Hypertension Control Evaluated by Office and Home Measurements: The LHAR National Registry.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2023Article
- Agreement between attended home and ambulatory blood pressure measurements in adolescents with chronic kidney disease.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2022Observational
- Home blood pressure monitoring: methodology, clinical relevance and practical application: a 2021 position paper by the Working Group on Blood Pressure Monitoring and Cardiovascular Variability of the European Society of Hypertension.Journal of hypertension · 2021Article
- Monitoring of Treatment for Arterial Hypertension–The Role of Office, Home, and 24 h Ambulatory Blood Pressure Measurement.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2021Review
- Cognitive remediation-enabled cognitive behaviour therapy for obesity: a case series.Eating and weight disorders : EWD · 2021Article
- Acceptability and psychological impact of out-of-office monitoring to diagnose hypertension: an evaluation of survey data from primary care patients.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2019Article
- Patient experience of home and waiting room blood pressure measurement: a qualitative study of patients with recently diagnosed hypertension.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2018Article
- Patients' and clinicians' views on the optimum schedules for self-monitoring of blood pressure: a qualitative focus group and interview study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2016Article
- Home Blood Pressure Monitoring.European cardiology · 2015Review
- Home blood pressure monitoring: primary role in hypertension management.Current hypertension reports · 2014Review
- Patients' preference for ambulatory versus home blood pressure monitoring.Journal of human hypertension · 2014Article
- The case for home monitoring in hypertension.BMC medicine · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The European Society of Hypertension (ESH), the American Heart Association (AHA) and the American Society of Hypertension (ASH) have published guidelines for self-monitoring of blood pressure (SBPM). We aimed to demonstrate the equivalence of SBPM with ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) in the assessment of hypertension. A total of 87 consecutive subjects referred from primary care for standard ABPM underwent a 1-week period of SBPM, as defined by the ESH guidelines, either before or after ABPM. There was no difference in mean blood pressure (BP): SBPM 142/87 mm Hg, daytime average ABPM 141/86 mm Hg. The intra-class correlation coefficient was 0.72 and 0.89 for systolic and diastolic pressure, respectively. SBPM is concordant with ABPM in classifying subjects as hypertensive or normotensive in 87% of cases (κ=0.56). The coefficient of variation of SBPM compared with ABPM was 5%. In answer to a direct question 81% of subjects preferred SBPM to ABPM. The current self-monitoring schedule recommended by the ESH, AHA and ASH is valid. The mean BP obtained from SBPM is equivalent to awake-time BP on ABPM, the accepted reference standard for 'out of office' BP measurement. SBPM is simpler to carry out, preferred by patients and should be considered on a par with ABPM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.