Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20164459›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2010

Spectrum of rhodopsin mutations in French autosomal dominant rod-cone dystrophy patients.

Isabelle Audo, Gaël Manes, Saddek Mohand-Saïd, Anne Friedrich, Marie-Elise Lancelot, Aline Antonio, Veselina Moskova-Doumanova, Oliver Poch, Xavier Zanlonghi, Christian P Hamel and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01235624 (Autosomal Dominant Retinitis Pigmentosa), which is not on this map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01235624 nacompletednot on this map

Autosomal Dominant Retinitis Pigmentosa: Prevalence of Known Genes Identification of New Loci / Genes

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, MontpellierRan2009 to 2013Enrolled1,161ConditionsAutosomal Dominant Retinitis PigmentosaArmsgenetic analysis
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Genes · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Isabelle AudoINSERM, U968, Paris, France.
Gaël Manes
Saddek Mohand-Saïd
Anne Friedrich
Marie-Elise Lancelot
Aline Antonio
Veselina Moskova-Doumanova
Oliver Poch
Xavier Zanlonghi
Christian P Hamel
José-Alain Sahel
Shomi S Bhattacharya
Christina Zeitz
Inserm · FRInstitut de la Vision · FRInstitut de génétique et de biologie moléculaire et cellulaire · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInstitute for Neurosciences of Montpellier · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledPURPOSE. To identify the prevalence of rhodopsin (RHO) mutations in French patients with autosomal dominant rod-cone dystrophies (adRPs). Methods. Detailed phenotypic characterization was performed, including precise family history, best corrected visual acuity with the ETDRS chart, slit lamp examination, kinetic and static perimetry, full-field and multifocal electroretinography (ERG), fundus autofluorescence imaging (FAF), and optical coherence tomography (OCT). For genetic diagnosis, genomic DNA of 79 families was isolated by standard

methodsThe coding exons and flanking intronic regions of RHO were PCR amplified, purified, and sequenced in the index patient. RESULTS. Of this French adRP sample, 16.5% carried an RHO mutation. Three different families showed a novel mutation (p. Leu88Pro, p.Met207Lys and p.Gln344Pro), while ten unrelated families showed recurrent, previously published mutations (p.Asn15Ser, p.Leu131Pro, p.Arg135Trp, p.Ser334GlyfsX21 and p.Pro347Leu). All mutations co-segregated with the phenotype within a family, and the novel mutations were not identified in control samples. CONCLUSIONS. This study revealed that the prevalence of RHO mutations in French adRP patients is in accordance with that in other studies from Europe. Most of the changes identified herein reflect recurrent mutations, within which p.Pro347Leu substitution is the most prevalent. Nevertheless, almost one fourth of the changes are novel, indicating that, although RHO is the first gene implicated and probably the most studied gene in RP, it is still important performing mutation analysis in RHO to detect novel changes. The detailed phenotype-genotype analyses in all available family members deliver the basis for therapeutic approaches in those families.

Indexed as

MutationAdolescentAdultChildDNA Mutational AnalysisElectroretinographyFemaleFluorescein AngiographyFranceGenes, DominantGenotypeHumansMaleMiddle AgedPedigreePhenotypeRhodopsin

Identifiers

PMID20164459
PMCPMC3102265
OpenAlexW2038352675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.