ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2010
Development of a multiplex primer extension assay for rapid detection of Salmonella isolates of diverse serotypes.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genome-Wide Searching Single Nucleotide-Polymorphisms (SNPs) and SNPs-Targeting a Multiplex Primer for Identification of CommonPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Development and Evaluation of a Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification Method for Rapid Detection of Aspergillus fumigatus.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2016Article
- Article
- Three multiplex snapshot assays for SNP genotyping in candidate innate immune genes.BMC research notes · 2013Article
- SNaPaer: a practical single nucleotide polymorphism multiplex assay for genotyping of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.PloS one · 2013Article
- Article
- Prediction system for rapid identification of Salmonella serotypes based on pulsed-field gel electrophoresis fingerprints.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2012Article
- Article
- Methodologies for Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica subtyping: gold standards and alternatives.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2011Review
- Rapid genoserotyping tool for classification of Salmonella serovars.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Food-borne salmonellosis is a major manifestation of gastrointestinal disease in humans across the globe. Accurate and rapid identification methods could positively impact the identification of isolates, enhance outbreak investigation, and aid infection control. The SNaPshot multiplex system is a primer extension-based method that enables multiplexing of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Here the method has been developed for the identification of five Salmonella serotypes, commonly detected in the United Kingdom, based on serotype-specific SNPs identified in the multilocus sequence typing (MLST) database of Salmonella enterica. The SNPs, in genes hemD, thrA, purE, and sucA, acted as surrogate markers for S. enterica serovars Typhimurium, Enteritidis, Virchow, Infantis, and Braenderup. The multiplex primer extension assay (MPEA) was conducted in two separate panels and evaluated using 152 Salmonella enterica isolates that were characterized by MLST. The MPEA was shown to be 100% specific and sensitive, within this collection of isolates. The MPEA is a sensitive and specific method for the identification and detection of Salmonella serotypes based upon SNPs seen in MLST data. The method can be applied in less than 6 h and has the potential to improve patient care and source tracing. The utility of the assay for identification of Salmonella serotypes directly from clinical specimens and food samples warrants further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.