Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20164251›Full record

Trial reportClinical and vaccine immunology : CVI2010

Randomized trial on the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of MenACWY-CRM, an investigational quadrivalent meningococcal glycoconjugate vaccine, administered concomitantly with a combined tetanus, reduced diphtheria, and acellular pertussis vaccine in adolescents and young adults.

Roberto Gasparini, Michele Conversano, Gianni Bona, Giovanni Gabutti, Alessandra Anemona, Peter M Dull, Francesca Ceddia

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00329901 (A Phase 3, Multi-Center, Observer Blind, Controlled, Randomized Study to Compare the Immunogenicity and Safety of the Concomitant Administration of a Combined Tetanus, Reduced Diphtheria, and Acellular Pertussis), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00329901 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase 3, Multi-Center, Observer Blind, Controlled, Randomized Study to Compare the Immunogenicity and Safety of the Concomitant Administration of a Combined Tetanus, Reduced Diphtheria, and Acellular Pertussis (Tdap) Vaccine and Chiron (Now Novartis) Meningococcal ACWY Conjugate Vaccine, With Either One Dose of Acellular Pertussis (Tdap) Vaccine, or One Dose of Chiron (Now Novartis) Meningococcal ACWY Conjugate Vaccine, in Healthy Subjects Aged 11-25 Years

TypeinterventionalSponsorNovartis VaccinesRan2006 to 2007Enrolled1,072ConditionsMeningococcal Disease, Meningococcal MeningitisArmsMeningococcal ACWY conjugate vaccine (MenACWY-CRM), Combined tetanus, reduced diphtheria and acellular pertussis vaccine (Tdap), saline placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Meningococcal Vaccination: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, United States, 2020.MMWR. Recommendations and reports : Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports · 2020
    Guideline
  2. Prevention of Pertussis, Tetanus, and Diphtheria with Vaccines in the United States: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP).MMWR. Recommendations and reports : Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports · 2018
    Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. [Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene · 2021
    Article
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Roberto GaspariniDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Via Pastore 1, 16132 Genoa, Italy. gasparini@unige.it
Michele Conversano
Gianni Bona
Giovanni Gabutti
Alessandra Anemona
Peter M Dull
Francesca Ceddia
University of Ferrara · ITNovartis (Italy) · ITUniversity of Genoa · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluated the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of an investigational quadrivalent meningococcal conjugate vaccine, MenACWY-CRM, when administered concomitantly with a combined tetanus, reduced diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine, in subjects aged 11 to 25 years. Subjects received either MenACWY-CRM and Tdap, MenACWY-CRM and saline placebo, or Tdap and saline placebo. No significant increase in reactogenicity and no clinically significant vaccine-related adverse events (AEs) occurred when MenACWY-CRM and Tdap were administered concomitantly. Similar immunogenic responses to diphtheria, tetanus, and meningococcal (serogroups A, C, W-135, and Y) antigens were observed, regardless of concomitant vaccine administration. Antipertussis antibody responses were comparable between vaccine groups for filamentous hemagglutinin and were slightly lower, although not clinically significantly, for pertussis toxoid and pertactin when the two vaccines were administered concomitantly. These results indicate that the investigational MenACWY-CRM vaccine is well tolerated and immunogenic and that it can be coadministered with Tdap to adolescents and young adults.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAntibodies, BacterialChildDiphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis VaccinesFemaleHumansMaleMeningococcal VaccinesPlacebosVaccines, ConjugateYoung AdultAntibodies, BacterialDiphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis VaccinesMenACWYMeningococcal VaccinesPlacebosVaccines, Conjugate

Identifiers

PMID20164251
PMCPMC2849330
OpenAlexW2011114820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.