Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20163724›Full record

ArticleBiomedical engineering online2010

Influence of nanofibers on growth and gene expression of human tendon derived fibroblast.

Christina Theisen, Susanne Fuchs-Winkelmann, Karola Knappstein, Turgay Efe, Jan Schmitt, Juergen R J Paletta, Markus D Schofer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical engineering online, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Rotator cuff repair and biologic augmentation-what do we know?JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Advances in Stem Cell Therapies for Rotator Cuff Injuries.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Biodegradable synthetic scaffolds for tendon regeneration.Muscles, ligaments and tendons journal · 2012
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christina TheisenDepartment of Orthopaedics and Rheumatology, University of Marburg, Baldingerstrasse, 35043 Marburg, Germany. theisenc@med.uni-marburg.de
Susanne Fuchs-Winkelmann
Karola Knappstein
Turgay Efe
Jan Schmitt
Juergen R J Paletta
Markus D Schofer
Philipps University of Marburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRotator cuff tears are a common and frequent lesion especially in older patients. The mechanisms of tendon repair are not fully understood. Common therapy options for tendon repair include mini-open or arthroscopic surgery. The use of growth factors in experimental studies is mentioned in the literature. Nanofiber scaffolds, which provide several criteria for the healing process, might be a suitable therapy option for operative treatment. The aim of this study was to explore the effects of nanofiber scaffolds on human tendon derived fibroblasts (TDF's), as well as the gene expression and matrix deposition of these fibroblasts.

methodsNanofibers composed of PLLA and PLLA/Col-I were seeded with human tendon derived fibroblasts and cultivated over a period of 22 days under growth-inductive conditions, and analyzed during the course of culture, with respect to gene expression of different extra cellular matrix components such as collagens, bigylcan and decorin. Furthermore, we measured cell densities and proliferation by using fluorescence microscopy.

resultsPLLA nanofibers possessed a growth inhibitory effect on TDF's. Furthermore, no meaningful influence on the gene expression of collagen I, collagen III and decorin could be observed, while the expression of collagen X increased during the course of cultivation. On the other hand, PLLA/Col-I blend nanofibers had no negative influence on the growth of TDF's. Furthermore, blending PLLA nanofibers with collagen had a positive effect on the gene expression of collagen I, III, X and decorin. Here, gene expression indicated that focal adherence kinases might be involved.

conclusionThis study indicates that the use of nanofibers influence expression of genes associated with the extra cellular matrix formation. The composition of the nanofibers plays a critical role. While PLLA/Col-I blend nanofibers enhance the collagen I and III formation, their expression on PLLA nanofibers was more comparable to controls. However, irrespective of the chemical composition of the fibres, the collagen deposition was altered, an effect which might be associated with a decreased expression of biglycanes.

Indexed as

Tissue ScaffoldsBiocompatible MaterialsCell ProliferationCells, CulturedCollagen Type IExtracellular Matrix ProteinsFibroblastsGene ExpressionHumansLactic AcidMaterials TestingPolyestersPolymersTendonsBiocompatible MaterialsCollagen Type IExtracellular Matrix ProteinsLactic AcidPolyesterspoly(lactide)Polymers

Identifiers

PMID20163724
PMCPMC2837661
OpenAlexW2126454618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.